Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36163
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Kenneth Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSgrò, Alessandroen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Leo Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorBuijs, Louis Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDaines, Lukeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPotter, Mark Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBouamrane, Matt-Mouleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Ewen Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T00:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-06T00:04:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other85en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36163-
dc.description.abstractRemote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationMcLean KA, Sgrò A, Brown LR, Buijs LF, Daines L, Potter MA, Bouamrane M & Harrison EM (2023) Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice. <i>npj Digital Medicine</i>, 6, Art. No.: 85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectRemote digital monitoringen_UK
dc.subjectPostoperative wound monitoringen_UK
dc.subjectMobile Healthen_UK
dc.subjectPerioperative Medicineen_UK
dc.titleEvaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practiceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid37147462en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlenpj Digital Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn2398-6352en_UK
dc.citation.issn2398-6352en_UK
dc.citation.volume6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderRoyal College of Surgeons of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.funderMedical Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailmatt-mouley.bouamrane@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/05/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWestern General Hospitalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWestern General Hospitalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWestern General Hospitalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationComputing Scienceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000983232400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85159021616en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2026653en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6482-9086en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5151-8342en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6181-7020en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1417-7515en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5018-3066en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-04-12en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-04-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-07-29en_UK
dc.subject.tagTelecare and Telehealthen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcLean, Kenneth A|0000-0001-6482-9086en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSgrò, Alessandro|0000-0001-5151-8342en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrown, Leo R|0000-0001-6181-7020en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBuijs, Louis F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDaines, Luke|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPotter, Mark A|0000-0002-1417-7515en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBouamrane, Matt-Mouley|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarrison, Ewen M|0000-0002-5018-3066en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Medical Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000692en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-07-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-07-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMcLean et al 2023.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2398-6352en_UK
Appears in Collections:Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McLean et al 2023.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.