Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36163
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | McLean, Kenneth A | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Sgrò, Alessandro | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Leo R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Buijs, Louis F | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Daines, Luke | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Potter, Mark A | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Harrison, Ewen M | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-06T00:04:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-06T00:04:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 85 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36163 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | en_UK |
dc.relation | McLean KA, Sgrò A, Brown LR, Buijs LF, Daines L, Potter MA, Bouamrane M & Harrison EM (2023) Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice. <i>npj Digital Medicine</i>, 6, Art. No.: 85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Remote digital monitoring | en_UK |
dc.subject | Postoperative wound monitoring | en_UK |
dc.subject | Mobile Health | en_UK |
dc.subject | Perioperative Medicine | en_UK |
dc.title | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 37147462 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | npj Digital Medicine | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2398-6352 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2398-6352 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 6 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Medical Research Council | en_UK |
dc.author.email | matt-mouley.bouamrane@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 05/05/2023 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Western General Hospital | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Western General Hospital | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Western General Hospital | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Computing Science | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000983232400001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85159021616 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 2026653 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-6482-9086 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-5151-8342 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-6181-7020 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-1417-7515 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5018-3066 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-04-12 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-04-12 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2024-07-29 | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Telecare and Telehealth | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | McLean, Kenneth A|0000-0001-6482-9086 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sgrò, Alessandro|0000-0001-5151-8342 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Brown, Leo R|0000-0001-6181-7020 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Buijs, Louis F| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Daines, Luke| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Potter, Mark A|0000-0002-1417-7515 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Harrison, Ewen M|0000-0002-5018-3066 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Medical Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000692 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2024-07-29 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-07-29| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | McLean et al 2023.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 2398-6352 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
McLean et al 2023.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.