Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35856
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMzyece, Chisha Chongoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGlendell, Miriamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGagkas, Zisisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorQuilliam, Richard S.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Ianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPagaling, Eulynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAkoumianaki, Ioannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Claireen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOliver, David M.en_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T01:04:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-14T01:04:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35856-
dc.description.abstractSeptic tank systems (STS) in rural catchments represent a potential source of microbial pollution to watercourses; however, data concerning the risk of faecal indicator organism (FIO) export from STS to surface waters are scarce. In the absence of empirical data, elicitation of expert judgements can provide an alternative approach to aid understanding of FIO pollution risk from STS. Our study employed a structured elicitation process using the Sheffield Elicitation Framework to obtain expert judgements on the proportion of FIOs likely to be delivered from STS to watercourses, based on 36 scenarios combining: (i) septic tank effluent movement risk, driven by soil hydro-morphological characteristics; (ii) distance of septic tank to watercourse; and (iii) degree of slope. Experts used the tertile method to elicit a range of values representing their beliefs of the proportion of FIOs likely to be delivered to a watercourse for each scenario. The experts judged that 93 % of FIOs would likely be delivered from an STS to a watercourse under the highest risk scenario that combined (i) very high STS effluent movement risk, (ii) STS distance to watercourse <10 m, and (iii) a location on a steep slope with gradient >25 %. Under the lowest risk scenario, the proportion of FIOs reaching a watercourse would likely reduce to 5 %. Expert confidence was high for scenarios that represented extremes of risk, while uncertainty increased for scenarios depicting intermediate risk conditions. The behavioural aggregation process employed to obtain a consensus among the experts proved to be useful for highlighting both areas of strong consensus and high uncertainty. The latter therefore represent priorities for future empirical research to further improve our understanding of potential pollution risk from septic tanks and in turn enable better assessments of potential threats to water quality in rural catchments throughout the world where decentralised wastewater systems are common.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationMzyece CC, Glendell M, Gagkas Z, Quilliam RS, Jones I, Pagaling E, Akoumianaki I, Newman C & Oliver DM (2024) Eliciting expert judgements to underpin our understanding of faecal indicator organism loss from septic tank systems. <i>Science of The Total Environment</i>, 921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171074en_UK
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_UK
dc.subjectPollutionen_UK
dc.subjectWaste Management and Disposalen_UK
dc.subjectEnvironmental Chemistryen_UK
dc.subjectEnvironmental Engineeringen_UK
dc.titleEliciting expert judgements to underpin our understanding of faecal indicator organism loss from septic tank systemsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171074en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid38378059en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleScience of the Total Environmenten_UK
dc.citation.issn0048-9697en_UK
dc.citation.issn1879-1026en_UK
dc.citation.volume921en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCommonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UKen_UK
dc.contributor.funderCommonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UKen_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.oliver@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/04/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85185843810&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=775dd64ad566cb04de6de87a0f24bf5b&sot=b&sdt=b&s=DOI%2810.1016%2Fj.scitotenv.2024.171074%29&sl=36&sessionSearchId=775dd64ad566cb04de6de87a0f24bf5b&relpos=0en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1987038en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7020-4410en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6898-1429en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-02-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-03-03en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMzyece, Chisha Chongo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGlendell, Miriam|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGagkas, Zisis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorQuilliam, Richard S.|0000-0001-7020-4410en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Ian|0000-0002-6898-1429en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPagaling, Eulyn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAkoumianaki, Ioanna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNewman, Claire|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOliver, David M.|0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-03-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2024-03-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0048969724012130-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0048-9697en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0048969724012130-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version5.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.