Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35853
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Can nutritional programming in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) be optimised with a reduced stimulus period?
Author(s): Mcmillan, Stuart
Martin, Samuel A M
Zbieta Król, El˙
Norambuena, Fernando
Baumgärtner, Simon
Gong, Xu
Tawfik, Marwa Mamdouh
Glencross, Brett
Taylor, John F
Tocher, Douglas R
Betancor, Mónica B
Contact Email: m.b.betancor@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Aquatic Science
Issue Date: May-2024
Date Deposited: 4-Mar-2024
Citation: Mcmillan S, Martin SAM, Zbieta Król E, Norambuena F, Baumgärtner S, Gong X, Tawfik MM, Glencross B, Taylor JF, Tocher DR & Betancor MB (2024) Can nutritional programming in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) be optimised with a reduced stimulus period?. <i>Aquaculture</i>, 585, p. 740686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740686
Abstract: New strategies are required to enhance the efficient assimilation and bioconversion of plant-based ingredients in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) diets, especially relating to the essential long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3). Our study investigated nutritional programming and specifically evaluated the optimal duration of dietary 'stimulus' and whether it could be reduced compared to a previous study using a three-week 'stimulus'. Fish were fed an experimental 'stimulus' vegetable-based diet (V S , 5% marine meals [MM]/0% fish oil [FO]) or a standard marine-based control (M S , 82% MM/4% FO) for either one (V1) or two weeks (V2 and M) from first exogenous feeding. All groups were then fed a standard marine based formulation, for an 'intermediate' grow-out phase to the end of 16 weeks post-first feeding, prior to a 'challenge' phase of six weeks when all fish were fed a vegetable-based diet (V C , 10% MM/0% FO). Compared to M, fish from both V1 and V2 groups were significantly smaller at the end of the 'stimulus' phase, but there were no statistical differences in overall growth, proximate or fatty acid compositions at the end of the trial. However, hepatosomatic and viscerosomatic indices were significantly lower in V1 compared to V2 fish and there was an overall trend of improved performance in V1 fish throughout the 'in-termediate' and 'challenge' phases. During the 'challenge' phase, M fish displayed a greater net gain of DHA than V1 fish, whilst V2 was a net consumer of all n-3 LC-PUFA over the same period. Compared to M, n-3 LC-PUFA biosynthesis genes in pyloric caeca were downregulated in both experimental groups indicating possible post-transcriptional modification of this pathway in either V1 or V2, considering the differences in DHA retention levels between groups. Taken together, the results suggested that nutritional programming was not initiated by a one-or two-week 'stimulus'. However, more studies are required to elucidate the mechanism behind enhanced performance of V1 fish.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740686
Rights: © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Notes: 0044-8486/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0044848624001479-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.