Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Rachel Mairien_UK
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Mohasinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBertotti, Marcelloen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCassidy, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChipuriro, Rejoiceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorClewett, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, Camen_UK
dc.contributor.authorElders, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFenge, Lee Annen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFox, Julieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGalway, Karenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGildea, Aideenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGuinness, Aileenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Michael Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T01:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-23T01:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_UK
dc.identifier.othere069979en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35770-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction . This research investigates how community-led organisations’ (CLOs’) use of assets-based approaches improves health and well-being, and how that might be different in different contexts. Assets-based approaches involve ‘doing with’ rather than ‘doing to’ and bring people in communities together to achieve positive change using their own knowledge, skills and experience. Some studies have shown that such approaches can have a positive effect on health and well-being. However, research is limited, and we know little about which approaches lead to which outcomes and how different contexts might affect success. Methods and analysis. Using a realist approach, we will work with 15 CLOs based in disadvantaged communities in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A realist synthesis of review papers, and a policy analysis in different contexts, precedes qualitative interviews and workshops with stakeholders, to find out how CLOs’ programmes work and identify existing data. We will explore participants’ experiences through: a Q methodology study; participatory photography workshops; qualitative interviews and measure outcomes using a longitudinal survey, with 225 CLO participants, to assess impact for people who connect with the CLOs. An economic analysis will estimate costs and benefits to participants, for different contexts and mechanisms. A ‘Lived Experience Panel’ of people connected with our CLOs as participants or volunteers, will ensure the appropriateness of the research, interpretation and reporting of findings. Ethics and dissemination. This project, research tools and consent processes have been approved by the Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee, and affirmed by Ethics Committees at Bournemouth University, Queen’s University Belfast and the University of East London. Common Health Assets does not involve any National Health Service sites, staff or patients. Findings will be presented through social media, project website, blogs, policy briefings, journal articles, conferences and visually in short digital stories, and photographic exhibitions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBritish Medical Journal Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationBaker RM, Ahmed M, Bertotti M, Cassidy J, Chipuriro R, Clewett E, Donaldson C, Elders A, Fenge LA, Fox J, Galway K, Gildea A, McGuinness A, McLean J & Roy MJ (2023) Common health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areas. <i>BMJ open</i>, 13, Art. No.: e069979. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069979en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleCommon health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areasen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069979en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid36927592en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.author.emailmichael.roy1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date16/03/2023en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional authors: Sarkis Manoukian, Helen Mason, Antony Morgan, Jill Mulholland, Liam O'Hare, Andrew Paterson, Sam Porter, Jack Rendall, Peter Seaman, Merron Simpson, Artur Steiner, Michael P Kellyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Centre for Population Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScottish Communities for Health and Wellbeingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBournemouth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAnnexe Communitiesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBogside and Brandywell Health Forumen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Centre for Population Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001003588500001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85150311960en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1968296en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1834-0826en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-02-23en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-02-23en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-01-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaker, Rachel Mairi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAhmed, Mohasin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBertotti, Marcello|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCassidy, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChipuriro, Rejoice|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorClewett, Emma|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDonaldson, Cam|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorElders, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFenge, Lee Ann|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFox, Julie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGalway, Karen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGildea, Aideen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGuinness, Aileen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcLean, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoy, Michael J|0000-0002-1834-0826en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-02-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-02-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee069979.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e069979.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.