Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllan, Julia Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Marieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Neilen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T00:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-24T00:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2008-04-18en_UK
dc.identifier.other123en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35493-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the significant health benefits associated with eating healthily, diet is extremely difficult to change, with the majority of people who intend to eat more healthily failing to do so. Recent evidence has suggested that the ability to turn intentions into actions may be related to individual differences in one facet of executive control - cognitive inhibition (i.e. the ability to inhibit irrelevant information and suppress prepotent responses). The present study investigates the role of this and other executive processes (inhibition, task switching, planning and cognitive flexibility) in the translation of dietary intentions into action. In addition, as the literature suggests that weak executive control may be associated with hyper-responsivity to cues to action, the role of executive processes in susceptibility to environmental food cues and responses to If-Then plans designed to cue intended behaviour are investigated. Methods: Future intentions about consumption of fruits and vegetables and snack foods will be measured in a sample of young adults. Actual consumption of the target foods will be recorded with computerised diaries over a subsequent 3-day period. Performance on a battery of established executive control tasks (Go-NoGo, Tower task, Verbal Fluency task and Trail-Making) will be used to predict the discrepancy between intended and actual dietary behaviour. In addition, executive control scores will be used to predict reported susceptibility to environmental food cues and benefit derived from the use of 'If-Then plans' designed to cue intended behaviour. Discussion: Our findings will add to understanding about the role of executive control in translating intentions into actions and may demonstrate potential for future public health interventions. If participants with weak executive control are found to be less likely to eat as they intend than those with strong executive control, then interventions that reduce the load on these executive processes may increase chances of successful intention-behaviour translation. If those with weak executive control are found to be more responsive to cues to action they may also benefit more from the use of If-Then plans designed to cue intended behaviour.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationAllan JL, Johnston M & Campbell N (2008) Why do people fail to turn good intentions into action?: The role of executive control processes in the translation of healthy eating intentions into action in young Scottish adults. <i>BMC Public Health</i>, 8, Art. No.: 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-123en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.subjectExecutive Controlen_UK
dc.subjectImplementation Intentionen_UK
dc.subjectPerceive Behavioural Controlen_UK
dc.subjectIntended Behaviouren_UK
dc.subjectExecutive Tasken_UK
dc.titleWhy do people fail to turn good intentions into action?: The role of executive control processes in the translation of healthy eating intentions into action in young Scottish adultsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-8-123en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid18423026en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.author.emailjulia.allan@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date18/04/2008en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000255562200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-42549163441en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1935991en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7287-8363en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2008-04-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-10-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllan, Julia L|0000-0001-7287-8363en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohnston, Marie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCampbell, Neil|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-10-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2023-10-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1471-2458-8-123.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1471-2458en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1471-2458-8-123.pdfFulltext - Published Version178.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.