Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35243
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCuthbert, Ross Nen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, Angela Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurbelin, Anna Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaubrock, Phillip Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDiagne, Christopheen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPattison, Zarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCourchamp, Francken_UK
dc.contributor.authorCatford, Jane Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-30T00:02:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-30T00:02:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35243-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the high costs of invasion are frequently cited and are a key motivation for environmental management and policy, synthesised data on invasion costs are scarce. Here, we quantify and examine the monetary costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom (UK) using a global synthesis of reported invasion costs. Invasive alien species have cost the UK economy between US$6.9 billion and $17.6 billion (£5.4 – £13.7 billion) in reported losses and expenses since 1976. Most costs were reported for the entire UK or Great Britain (97%); country-scale cost reporting for the UK's four constituent countries was scarce. Reports of animal invasions were the costliest ($4.7 billion), then plant ($1.3 billion) and fungal ($206.7 million) invasions. Reported damage costs (i.e. excluding management costs) were higher in terrestrial ($4.8 billion) than aquatic or semi-aquatic environments ($29.8 million), and primarily impacted agriculture ($4.2 billion). Invaders with earlier introduction years accrued significantly higher total invasion costs. Invasion costs have been increasing rapidly since 1976, and have cost the UK economy $157.1 million (£122.1 million) per annum, on average. Published information on specific economic costs included only 42 of 520 invaders reported in the UK and was generally available only for the most intensively studied taxa, with just four species contributing 90% of species-specific costs. Given that many of the invasive species lacking cost data are actively managed and have well-recognised impacts, this suggests that cost information is incomplete and that totals presented here are vast underestimates owing to knowledge gaps. Financial expenditure on managing invasions is a fraction (37%) of the costs incurred through damage from invaders; greater investments in UK invasive species research and management are, therefore, urgently required.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPensoft Publishersen_UK
dc.relationCuthbert RN, Bartlett AC, Turbelin AJ, Haubrock PJ, Diagne C, Pattison Z, Courchamp F & Catford JA (2021) Economic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom. <i>NeoBiota</i>, 67, pp. 299-328. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59743en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectEnglanden_UK
dc.subjectInvaCosten_UK
dc.subjectinvasive alien speciesen_UK
dc.subjectnon-native speciesen_UK
dc.subjectNorthern Irelanden_UK
dc.subjectpublished monetary impactsen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectsocioeconomic sectoren_UK
dc.subjectWalesen_UK
dc.titleEconomic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdomen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/neobiota.67.59743en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNeoBiotaen_UK
dc.citation.issn1314-2488en_UK
dc.citation.issn1619-0033en_UK
dc.citation.volume67en_UK
dc.citation.spage299en_UK
dc.citation.epage328en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.author.emailzarah.pattison2@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date29/07/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversite Paris-Saclayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museumen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversite Paris-Saclayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversite Paris-Saclayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Melbourneen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000681070700012en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1905461en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2770-254Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4585-9797en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2154-4341en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6406-1270en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5243-0876en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7605-4548en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0582-5960en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-12-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-05-23en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCuthbert, Ross N|0000-0003-2770-254Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBartlett, Angela C|0000-0002-4585-9797en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurbelin, Anna J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaubrock, Phillip J|0000-0003-2154-4341en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDiagne, Christophe|0000-0002-6406-1270en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPattison, Zarah|0000-0002-5243-0876en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCourchamp, Franck|0000-0001-7605-4548en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCatford, Jane A|0000-0003-0582-5960en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Newcastle University|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000774en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-05-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-05-23|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNB-67-299_article-59743_en_1.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1619-0033en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NB-67-299_article-59743_en_1.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.