Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35243
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cuthbert, Ross N | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Bartlett, Angela C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Turbelin, Anna J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Haubrock, Phillip J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Diagne, Christophe | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Pattison, Zarah | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Courchamp, Franck | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Catford, Jane A | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-30T00:02:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-30T00:02:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35243 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although the high costs of invasion are frequently cited and are a key motivation for environmental management and policy, synthesised data on invasion costs are scarce. Here, we quantify and examine the monetary costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom (UK) using a global synthesis of reported invasion costs. Invasive alien species have cost the UK economy between US$6.9 billion and $17.6 billion (£5.4 – £13.7 billion) in reported losses and expenses since 1976. Most costs were reported for the entire UK or Great Britain (97%); country-scale cost reporting for the UK's four constituent countries was scarce. Reports of animal invasions were the costliest ($4.7 billion), then plant ($1.3 billion) and fungal ($206.7 million) invasions. Reported damage costs (i.e. excluding management costs) were higher in terrestrial ($4.8 billion) than aquatic or semi-aquatic environments ($29.8 million), and primarily impacted agriculture ($4.2 billion). Invaders with earlier introduction years accrued significantly higher total invasion costs. Invasion costs have been increasing rapidly since 1976, and have cost the UK economy $157.1 million (£122.1 million) per annum, on average. Published information on specific economic costs included only 42 of 520 invaders reported in the UK and was generally available only for the most intensively studied taxa, with just four species contributing 90% of species-specific costs. Given that many of the invasive species lacking cost data are actively managed and have well-recognised impacts, this suggests that cost information is incomplete and that totals presented here are vast underestimates owing to knowledge gaps. Financial expenditure on managing invasions is a fraction (37%) of the costs incurred through damage from invaders; greater investments in UK invasive species research and management are, therefore, urgently required. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Pensoft Publishers | en_UK |
dc.relation | Cuthbert RN, Bartlett AC, Turbelin AJ, Haubrock PJ, Diagne C, Pattison Z, Courchamp F & Catford JA (2021) Economic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom. <i>NeoBiota</i>, 67, pp. 299-328. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59743 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | England | en_UK |
dc.subject | InvaCost | en_UK |
dc.subject | invasive alien species | en_UK |
dc.subject | non-native species | en_UK |
dc.subject | Northern Ireland | en_UK |
dc.subject | published monetary impacts | en_UK |
dc.subject | Scotland | en_UK |
dc.subject | socioeconomic sector | en_UK |
dc.subject | Wales | en_UK |
dc.title | Economic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3897/neobiota.67.59743 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | NeoBiota | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1314-2488 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1619-0033 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 67 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 299 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 328 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.author.email | zarah.pattison2@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 29/07/2021 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Queen's University Belfast | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | King's College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universite Paris-Saclay | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universite Paris-Saclay | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universite Paris-Saclay | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Melbourne | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000681070700012 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1905461 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-2770-254X | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-4585-9797 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-2154-4341 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-6406-1270 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5243-0876 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-7605-4548 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-0582-5960 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-12-15 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-12-15 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2023-05-23 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Cuthbert, Ross N|0000-0003-2770-254X | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Bartlett, Angela C|0000-0002-4585-9797 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Turbelin, Anna J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Haubrock, Phillip J|0000-0003-2154-4341 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Diagne, Christophe|0000-0002-6406-1270 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Pattison, Zarah|0000-0002-5243-0876 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Courchamp, Franck|0000-0001-7605-4548 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Catford, Jane A|0000-0003-0582-5960 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Newcastle University|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000774 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2023-05-23 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-05-23| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | NB-67-299_article-59743_en_1.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1619-0033 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NB-67-299_article-59743_en_1.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.