Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35165
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions
Author(s): Gunasekara, Lahiru
Robb, David J
Zhang, Abraham
Contact Email: abraham.zhang@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Product take-back
Returns management
Circular economy
Circular supply chain
Closed loop supply chain
Literature review
Issue Date: Jun-2023
Date Deposited: 29-Mar-2023
Citation: Gunasekara L, Robb DJ & Zhang A (2023) Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions. <i>International Journal of Production Economics</i>, 260, Art. No.: 108844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108844
Abstract: The vision of a circular economy (CE) inspires firms, governments, and scholars alike. The transition is underway in both practice and the literature, but success depends on the effective implementation of circular supply chains (CSCs), which encompass acquiring used products, sorting them by type and quality, and deciding which to dispose to various processing options. We review 131 high-impact journal articles on returns acquisition, sorting, and disposition (ASD) over the decade 2012-2021 to assess the current status of ASD research for CSCs and to discuss important research directions for supporting the transition to a CE. Uniquely synthesising the state of the art on all these three overarching decision areas, we find aspects of CSCs prominent in the decade's research agenda, such as closed loop supply chain coordination and ASD for remanufacturing, and highlight growing coverage of behavioural considerations. Research applicability has been constrained by a lack of empirical studies, limited practical validation of mathematical models, a focus on economic objectives, and restrictive modelling assumptions about behaviour and uncertainty in returns. We recommend further research in each part of ASD to facilitate a CSC, and as a whole, for transitioning to a CE. CE concepts such as joint decision-making between product design and returns management, cross-sector collaboration, and product-service systems should inform the agenda for CSC research.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108844
Rights: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_IJPE_ASD_CSC_Review.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.