|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating?|
|Keywords:||Duty of Care|
|Citation:||Brown J (2022) The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating?. <i>Scots Law Times</i>, 2022 (35), pp. 229-234.|
|Abstract:||First in a four-part series. Questions the extent to which Scots lawyers should 'revel' in the fame of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 SC (HL) 31 in light of the fact that Scotland is not itself a Common law jurisdiction. Discusses the difficulties with the idea - taken as an article of faith in the case itself - that 'there [was] no speciality of Scots law involved and that the case [could] safely be decided on principles common to both systems [i.e., Scots and English law]' and considers the dangers that adopting the 'incremental approach' favoured in English jurisprudence would have in respect of the 'intellectual superstructure' of Scots delict.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Scots Law Times following peer review. The definitive published version Brown J (2022) The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating? Scots Law Times, 2022 (35), pp. 229-234. is available online on Westlaw UK. Reuse is allowed under an unrestricted use licence (CC BY).|
|The Mouse and the Snail Part I.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||169.86 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2023-10-01 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.