Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34688
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jonathanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T01:00:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T01:00:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34688-
dc.description.abstractFirst in a four-part series. Questions the extent to which Scots lawyers should 'revel' in the fame of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 SC (HL) 31 in light of the fact that Scotland is not itself a Common law jurisdiction. Discusses the difficulties with the idea - taken as an article of faith in the case itself - that 'there [was] no speciality of Scots law involved and that the case [could] safely be decided on principles common to both systems [i.e., Scots and English law]' and considers the dangers that adopting the 'incremental approach' favoured in English jurisprudence would have in respect of the 'intellectual superstructure' of Scots delict.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_UK
dc.relationBrown J (2022) The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating?. <i>Scots Law Times</i>, 2022 (35), pp. 229-234.en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Scots Law Times following peer review. The definitive published version Brown J (2022) The mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating? Scots Law Times, 2022 (35), pp. 229-234. is available online on Westlaw UK. Reuse is allowed under an unrestricted use licence (CC BY).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDuty of Careen_UK
dc.subjectForseeabilityen_UK
dc.subjectLegal historyen_UK
dc.subjectPersonal injuryen_UK
dc.subjectProfessional negligenceen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectTortious liabilityen_UK
dc.titleThe mouse and the snail: reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson: Part 1 - a case worth celebrating?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2023-10-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[The Mouse and the Snail Part I.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after publication.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleScots Law Timesen_UK
dc.citation.issn2754-222Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0036-908Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume2022en_UK
dc.citation.issue35en_UK
dc.citation.spage229en_UK
dc.citation.epage234en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.author.emailjonathan.brown@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1835083en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-07-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-08-30en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrown, Jonathan|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Strathclyde|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008078en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-10-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2023-09-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-10-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameThe Mouse and the Snail Part I.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2754-222Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Mouse and the Snail Part I.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version169.86 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2023-10-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.