Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34664
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOvenden, Thomas Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPerks, Mike Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorForrester, David Ien_UK
dc.contributor.authorMencuccini, Maurizioen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRhoades, Jazzen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Danielle Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorStokes, Victoria Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJump, Alistair Sen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T01:01:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-16T01:01:13Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10en_UK
dc.identifier.other120448en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34664-
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how we can increase the resilience of forest systems to future extreme drought events is increasingly important as these events become more frequent and intense. Diversifying production forests using intimate mixtures of trees with complementary functional traits is considered as one promising silvicultural approach that may increase drought resilience. However, the direction and magnitude of the drought response of mixed-species stands relative to monospecific stands of the same species can vary with species identity, relative abundance and levels of competition in a focal tree's immediate neighbourhood. Using a long-term experiment where tree-level mortality and the neighbourhood composition of each tree was known, we assessed the radial growth response of 24-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) trees in intimately mixed and monospecific stands to a short-duration, high-intensity spring drought in Scotland. Mixing proportions included 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25 of P. sylvestris and P. sitchensis. At the species level, Scots pine was more drought resistant and resilient than Sitka spruce, while Sitka spruce showed higher recovery. Surprisingly, neither pre-drought tree size nor neighbourhood competition were significantly associated with resistance or resilience to drought, and trees of both species within monospecific stands showed higher recovery and resilience than trees growing in mixed stands. Our study suggests intimate mixtures of these two species may not be an effective way to mitigate the negative impacts of future extreme spring drought events. Given that these two species comprise almost 70% of coniferous forests in the UK, our results highlight the pressing need to better understand their vulnerability to drought and the conditions under which intimate mixtures of these species could be beneficial or detrimental. Such knowledge is essential if we are to enable forest managers to effectively plan how to adapt these forests to the challenges of a changing climate.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationOvenden TS, Perks MP, Forrester DI, Mencuccini M, Rhoades J, Thompson DL, Stokes VJ & Jump AS (2022) Intimate mixtures of Scots pine and Sitka spruce do not increase resilience to spring drought. <i>Forest Ecology and Management</i>, 521, Art. No.: 120448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120448en_UK
dc.rightsElsevier has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink service to offer a variety of options for reusing this content. Note: This article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license and permits non-commercial use of the work as published, without adaptation or alteration provided the work is fully attributed.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectGlobal change ecologyen_UK
dc.subjectResilienceen_UK
dc.subjectExtreme droughten_UK
dc.subjectPinus sylvestrisen_UK
dc.subjectPicea sitchensisen_UK
dc.subjectMixed Forestsen_UK
dc.titleIntimate mixtures of Scots pine and Sitka spruce do not increase resilience to spring droughten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120448en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleForest Ecology and Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn1872-7042en_UK
dc.citation.issn0378-1127en_UK
dc.citation.volume521en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderForest Researchen_UK
dc.author.emaila.s.jump@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date03/08/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationForest Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationForest Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNS Management and Supporten_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85135346025en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1853482en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6957-1333en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2167-6451en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-07-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-11-14en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorOvenden, Thomas S|0000-0002-6957-1333en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPerks, Mike P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorForrester, David I|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMencuccini, Maurizio|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRhoades, Jazz|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Danielle L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStokes, Victoria J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJump, Alistair S|0000-0002-2167-6451en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Forest Research|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-11-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2022-11-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S037811272200442X-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1872-7042en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S037811272200442X-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.