Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34469
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCage, Eilidhen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCranney, Rebekahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBotha, Moniqueen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T00:06:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-29T00:06:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-23en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34469-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Masking involves blending in or covering a stigmatized identity, to avoid discrimination and to “pass” within society. Autistic people often report masking, both intentionally and unintentionally, to get by in social situations. Autistic people who report high rates of masking also tend to experience poorer mental health. It is important we understand whether there are variables that can protect against the negative effects of masking. One such potential variable is autistic community connectedness (ACC)—being part of and belonging to the autistic community. Past research suggests there are benefits for autistic people socially connecting with other autistic people. We investigated whether ACC could moderate the relationship between masking and wellbeing. Methods: One hundred ninety-six autistic people completed an online survey including measures of ACC, masking, and mental wellbeing. We used moderation analysis to test whether ACC acted as a buffer between masking and wellbeing. Results: Higher self-reported masking related to poorer mental wellbeing. Higher ACC related to more positive wellbeing. Higher ACC correlated with more masking. However, there was no interaction effect, and ACC did not moderate the relationship between masking and wellbeing. Conclusions: Although ACC did relate to more positive mental wellbeing overall, it did not moderate the negative relationship between masking and wellbeing. If masking relates to the prejudice faced by autistic people, those with greater attachment to the autistic community may also be more aware of discrimination against their community. Furthermore, autistic people who are more connected might experience a higher salience of masking when moving between autistic and nonautistic settings. Tackling prejudice toward autistic people is critical in helping to reduce the negative effects associated with masking, and we must endeavor to change perceptions and increase inclusion of autistic people.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Incen_UK
dc.relationCage E, Cranney R & Botha M (2022) Brief Report: Does Autistic Community Connectedness Moderate the Relationship Between Masking and Wellbeing?. Autism in Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0096en_UK
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the following article: Cage E, Cranney R & Botha M (2022) Brief Report: Does Autistic Community Connectedness Moderate the Relationship Between Masking and Wellbeing? Autism in Adulthood, which has been published in final form at Autism in Adulthood at https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0096. This original submission version of the article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers’ self-archiving terms and conditions.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectmaskingen_UK
dc.subjectcamouflagingen_UK
dc.subjectautistic communityen_UK
dc.subjectstigmaen_UK
dc.subjectmental wellbeingen_UK
dc.titleBrief Report: Does Autistic Community Connectedness Moderate the Relationship Between Masking and Wellbeing?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/aut.2021.0096en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAutism in Adulthooden_UK
dc.citation.issn2573-959Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn2573-9581en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emaileilidh.cage@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date23/06/2022en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1825736en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6281-1632en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5935-9654en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-05-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-06-27en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCage, Eilidh|0000-0001-6281-1632en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCranney, Rebekah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBotha, Monique|0000-0002-5935-9654en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-06-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2022-06-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCage_et_al2022_ACC_masking_wb_accepted.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2573-959Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cage_et_al2022_ACC_masking_wb_accepted.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version440.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.