Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34397
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOlszowski, Rafałen_UK
dc.contributor.authorZabdyr-Jamróz, Michałen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Sebastianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPięta, Piotren_UK
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Wasimen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T00:00:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-08T00:00:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other750en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34397-
dc.description.abstractPoland’s efforts to combat COVID-19 were hindered by endemic vaccination hesitancy and the prevalence of opponents to pandemic restrictions. In this environment, the policy of a COVID-19 vaccination mandate faces strong resistance in the public debate. Exploring the discourse around this resistance could help uncover the motives and develop an understanding of vaccination hesitancy in Poland. This paper aims to conduct a social network analysis and content analysis of Twitter discussions around the intention of the Polish Ministry of Health to introduce mandatory vaccinations for COVID-19. Twitter was chosen as a platform to study because of the critical role it played during the global health crisis. Twitter data were retrieved from 26 July to 9 December 2021 through the API v2 for Academic Research, and analysed using NodeXL and Gephi. When conducting social network analysis, nodes were ranked by their betweenness centrality. Clustering analysis with the Clauset–Newman–Moore algorithm revealed two important groups of users: advocates and opponents of mandatory vaccination. The temporal trends of tweets, the most used hashtags, the sentiment expressed in the most popular tweets, and correlations with epidemiological data were also studied. The results reveal a substantial degree of polarisation, a high intensity of the discussion, and a high degree of involvement of Twitter users. Vaccination mandate advocates were consistently more numerous, but less engaged and less mobilised to “preach” their own stances. Vaccination mandate opponents were vocal and more mobilised to participate: either as original authors or as information diffusers. Our research leads to the conclusion that systematic monitoring of the public debate on vaccines is essential not only in counteracting misinformation, but also in crafting evidence-based as well as emotionally motivating narratives.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationOlszowski R, Zabdyr-Jamróz M, Baran S, Pięta P & Ahmed W (2022) A Social Network Analysis of Tweets Related to Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination in Poland. Vaccines, 10 (5), Art. No.: 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050750en_UK
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_UK
dc.subjectmandatory vaccinationen_UK
dc.subjectvaccination hesitancyen_UK
dc.subjectsocial network analysisen_UK
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_UK
dc.subjectTwitter debateen_UK
dc.subjectPolanden_UK
dc.titleA Social Network Analysis of Tweets Related to Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination in Polanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vaccines10050750en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35632506en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleVaccinesen_UK
dc.citation.issn2076-393Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailwasim.ahmed@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/05/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAGH University of Science And Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJagiellonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCracow University of Economicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAGH University of Science And Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManagement, Work and Organisationen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000801817300001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85130416661en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1820216en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4494-3890en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8490-7117en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8923-1865en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-05-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-06-06en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorOlszowski, Rafał|0000-0002-4494-3890en_UK
local.rioxx.authorZabdyr-Jamróz, Michał|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaran, Sebastian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPięta, Piotr|0000-0001-8490-7117en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAhmed, Wasim|0000-0001-8923-1865en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-06-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-06-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamevaccines-10-00750-v2 (1).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2076-393Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
vaccines-10-00750-v2 (1).pdfFulltext - Published Version2.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.