Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34263
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Ensuring robust radiological risk assessment for wildlife: insights from the International Atomic Energy Agency EMRAS and MODARIA programmes
Author(s): Beresford, Nicholas
Beaugelin-Seiller, Karine
Barnett, Cath
Brown, Justin
Doering, Che
Caffrey, Emily
Johansen, Mat
Melintescu, Anca
Ruedig, Elizabeth
Vandenhove, Hildegarde
Vives I Batlle, Jordi
Wood, Michael
Yankovich, Tamara
Copplestone, David
Contact Email: david.copplestone@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: Jun-2022
Date Deposited: 3-May-2022
Citation: Beresford N, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Barnett C, Brown J, Doering C, Caffrey E, Johansen M, Melintescu A, Ruedig E, Vandenhove H, Vives I Batlle J, Wood M, Yankovich T & Copplestone D (2022) Ensuring robust radiological risk assessment for wildlife: insights from the International Atomic Energy Agency EMRAS and MODARIA programmes. Journal of Radiological Protection, 42 (2), Art. No.: 020512. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac6043
Abstract: In response to changing international recommendations and national requirements, a number of assessment approaches, and associated tools and models, have been developed over the last circa 20 years to assess radiological risk to wildlife. In this paper, we summarise international intercomparison exercises and scenario applications of available radiological assessment models for wildlife to aid future model users and those such as regulators who interpret assessments. Through our studies, we have assessed the fitness for purpose of various models and tools, identified the major sources of uncertainty and made recommendations on how the models and tools can best be applied to suit the purposes of an assessment. We conclude that the commonly used tiered or graded assessment tools are generally fit for purpose for conducting screening-level assessments of radiological impacts to wildlife. Radiological protection of the environment (or wildlife) is still a relatively new development within the overall system of radiation protection and environmental assessment approaches are continuing to develop. Given that some new/developing approaches differ considerably from the more established models/tools and there is an increasing international interest in developing approaches that support the effective regulation of multiple stressors (including radiation), we recommend the continuation of coordinated international programmes for model development, intercomparison and scenario testing.
DOI Link: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac6043
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the Accepted Manuscript version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Radiological Protection. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac6043. Use of this version is licenced under a CC BY-NC-ND licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Beresford et al. MODARIA Paper 19 WG5_CLEAN_Post reviewv2.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version794.15 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2023-05-04    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.