Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34244
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Pippa Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoody, Catherine Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurner, T Edwarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Rebeccaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDinsmore, Kerry Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Andy Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBillett, Mike Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Roxaneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLeith, Fraseren_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolden, Josephen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T07:15:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-03T07:15:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03en_UK
dc.identifier.othere14520en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34244-
dc.description.abstractOpen-water perennial pools are common natural features of peatlands globally, and peatland restoration often results in new pool creation, yet the concentrations of different forms of aquatic carbon (C) in natural and artificial restoration pools are not well studied. We compared carbon concentrations in both natural pools and restoration pools (4–15 years old) on three blanket peatlands in northern Scotland. At all sites, restoration pools were more acidic and had mean dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in restoration pools of 23, 22, and 31 mg L−1 compared with natural pool means of 11, 11 and 15 mg L−1 respectively across the three sites. Restoration pools had a greater fulvic acid prevalence than the natural pools and their DOC was more aromatic. Restoration pools were supersaturated with dissolved CO2 at around 10 times atmospheric levels, whereas for natural pools, CO2 concentrations were just above atmospheric levels. Dissolved CH4 concentrations were not different between pool types, but were ~200 times higher than atmospheric levels. Regular sampling at one of the peatland sites over 2.5 years showed that particulate organic carbon (POC) concentrations were generally below 7 mg L−1 except during the warm, dry summer of 2013. At this regularly-sampled site, natural pools were found to process DOC so that mean pool outflow concentrations in overland flow were significantly lower than mean inflow DOC concentrations. Such an effect was not found for the restoration pools. Soil solution and pool water chemistry, and relationships between DOC and CO2 concentrations suggest that different processes are controlling the transformation of C, and therefore the form and amount of C, in natural pools compared to restoration pools.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationChapman PJ, Moody CS, Turner TE, McKenzie R, Dinsmore KJ, Baird AJ, Billett MF, Andersen R, Leith F & Holden J (2022) Carbon concentrations in natural and restoration pools in blanket peatlands. Hydrological Processes, 36 (3), Art. No.: e14520. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14520en_UK
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Hydrological Processes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectaquaticen_UK
dc.subjectcarbon dioxideen_UK
dc.subjectdissolved organic carbonen_UK
dc.subjectmethaneen_UK
dc.subjectparticulate organic carbonen_UK
dc.subjectpondsen_UK
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_UK
dc.subjectwetlanden_UK
dc.titleCarbon concentrations in natural and restoration pools in blanket peatlandsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hyp.14520en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHydrological Processesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1099-1085en_UK
dc.citation.issn0885-6087en_UK
dc.citation.volume36en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date13/02/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Highlands and Islandsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Highlands and Islandsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000774895000006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85127235645en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1811997en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3737-6063en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-02-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-04-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Pippa J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoody, Catherine S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurner, T Edward|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcKenzie, Rebecca|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDinsmore, Kerry J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaird, Andy J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBillett, Mike F|0000-0003-3737-6063en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAndersen, Roxane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLeith, Fraser|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolden, Joseph|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-04-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-04-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameChapman-etal-HP-2022.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1099-1085en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chapman-etal-HP-2022.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.