Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStoffel, Sandro Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHirst, Yaseminen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHanif, Sahidaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Lorraineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-30T00:32:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-30T00:32:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34240-
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. Methods Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics. Results In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit. Conclusion Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_UK
dc.relationStoffel ST, McGregor L, Hirst Y, Hanif S, Morris L & von Wagner C (2022) Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England. Journal of Medical Screening. https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCancer screeningen_UK
dc.subjecthealth promotionen_UK
dc.subjectfaecal occult blood testen_UK
dc.subjectBlack and minority ethnic groupsen_UK
dc.titleEvaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, Englanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/09691413221089184en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35410541en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Medical Screeningen_UK
dc.citation.issn1475-5793en_UK
dc.citation.issn0969-1413en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date12/04/2022en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBlackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000781750700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85129174989en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1811986en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-02-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-04-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorStoffel, Sandro T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHirst, Yasemin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHanif, Sahida|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorris, Lorraine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-04-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-04-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename09691413221089184.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1475-5793en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
09691413221089184.pdfFulltext - Published Version639.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.