University of Stirling    STORRE: Stirling Online Research Repository University Circle Images   Research Led, Student Focused  
 

STORRE >
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health >
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/3416

Appears in Collections:School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings
Author(s): Entwistle, Vikki A
Watt, Ian S
Gilhooly, Ken
Bugge, Carol
Haites, Neva
Walker, Anne E
Contact Email: carol.bugge@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Decision quality
Shared decision-making
Performance assessment
Issue Date: Oct-2004
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Gilhooly K, Bugge C, Haites N & Walker AE (2004) Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings, Patient Education and Counseling, 55 (1), pp. 105-113.
Abstract: In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients’ participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people’s evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers’ actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/3416
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: University of Aberdeen
University of York
University of Paisley
NMH Research - Stirling
University of Aberdeen
University of Aberdeen

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Bugge - Assessing patients participation and quality of decision-making - insights from a study etc.pdf89.89 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 31/12/2999 Restricted Access. Click to Request a copy from the author!

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Recommend this item

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Repository Service Operated by Information Services, University of Stirling
Powered by DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback