Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/3416
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, Vikki Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Ian Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGilhooly, Kenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBugge, Carolen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaites, Nevaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Anne Een_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-11T20:46:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-11T20:46:52Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2004-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/3416-
dc.description.abstractIn the context of a qualitative study exploring patients’ participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people’s evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers’ actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationEntwistle VA, Watt IS, Gilhooly K, Bugge C, Haites N & Walker AE (2004) Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counseling, 55 (1), pp. 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectDecision qualityen_UK
dc.subjectShared decision-makingen_UK
dc.subjectPerformance assessmenten_UK
dc.subjectPatient participationen_UK
dc.subjectDecision makingen_UK
dc.titleAssessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settingsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-07en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Bugge - Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making - insights from a study etc.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePatient Education and Counselingen_UK
dc.citation.issn0738-3991en_UK
dc.citation.volume55en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage105en_UK
dc.citation.epage113en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcarol.bugge@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date06/11/2003en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Yorken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Paisleyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid814785en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4071-0803en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2003-11-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2011-10-10en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorEntwistle, Vikki A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatt, Ian S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGilhooly, Ken|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBugge, Carol|0000-0002-4071-0803en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaites, Neva|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWalker, Anne E|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBugge - Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making - insights from a study etc.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0738-3991en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bugge - Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making - insights from a study etc.pdfFulltext - Published Version89.89 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-07    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.