Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34004
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchaeffer, Blakeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSalls, Wilsonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoffer, Meganen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLebreton, Caroleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWerther, Mortimeren_UK
dc.contributor.authorStelzer, Kerstinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUrquhart, Erinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGurlin, Danielaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-08T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03en_UK
dc.identifier.other179en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34004-
dc.description.abstractWater quality monitoring is relevant for protecting the designated, or beneficial uses, of water such as drinking, aquatic life, recreation, irrigation, and food supply that support the economy, human well-being, and aquatic ecosystem health. Managing finite water resources to support these designated uses requires information on water quality so that managers can make sustainable decisions. Chlorophyll-a (chl-a, µg L−1) concentration can serve as a proxy for phytoplankton biomass and may be used as an indicator of increased anthropogenic nutrient stress. Satellite remote sensing may present a complement to in situ measures for assessments of water quality through the retrieval of chl-a with in-water algorithms. Validation of chl-a algorithms across US lakes improves algorithm maturity relevant for monitoring applications. This study compares performance of the Case 2 Regional Coast Colour (C2RCC) chl-a retrieval algorithm, a revised version of the Maximum-Peak Height (MPH(P)) algorithm, and three scenarios merging these two approaches. Satellite data were retrieved from the MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) and the Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI), while field observations were obtained from 181 lakes matched with U.S. Water Quality Portal chl-a data. The best performance based on mean absolute multiplicative error (MAEmult) was demonstrated by the merged algorithm referred to as C15−M10 (MAEmult = 1.8, biasmult = 0.97, n = 836). In the C15−M10 algorithm, the MPH(P) chl-a value was retained if it was > 10 µg L−1; if the MPH(P) value was ≤ 10 µg L−1, the C2RCC value was selected, as long as that value was  <  15 µg L−1. Time-series and lake-wide gradients compared against independent assessments from Lake Champlain and long-term ecological research stations in Wisconsin were used as complementary examples supporting water quality reporting requirements. Trophic state assessments for Wisconsin lakes provided examples in support of inland water quality monitoring applications. This study presents and assesses merged adaptations of chl-a algorithms previously reported independently. Additionally, it contributes to the transition of chl-a algorithm maturity by quantifying error statistics for a number of locations and times.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationSchaeffer B, Salls W, Coffer M, Lebreton C, Werther M, Stelzer K, Urquhart E & Gurlin D (2022) Merging of the Case 2 Regional Coast Colour and Maximum-Peak Height chlorophyll-a algorithms: validation and demonstration of satellite-derived retrievals across US lakes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194 (3), Art. No.: 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09684-wen_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSatelliteen_UK
dc.subjectWater qualityen_UK
dc.subjectChlorophyllen_UK
dc.subjectLakesen_UK
dc.subjectReservoirsen_UK
dc.subjectTrophic stateen_UK
dc.titleMerging of the Case 2 Regional Coast Colour and Maximum-Peak Height chlorophyll-a algorithms: validation and demonstration of satellite-derived retrievals across US lakesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-021-09684-wen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35157155en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessmenten_UK
dc.citation.issn1573-2959en_UK
dc.citation.issn0167-6369en_UK
dc.citation.volume194en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission (Horizon 2020)en_UK
dc.citation.date14/02/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationU.S. Environmental Protection Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationU.S. Environmental Protection Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationU.S. Environmental Protection Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrockmann Consulten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrockmann Consulten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrockmann Consulten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNASA Goddard Space Flight Centeren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWisconsin Department of Natural Resourcesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000755146400005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85124627998en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1800525en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-12-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-03-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSchaeffer, Blake|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSalls, Wilson|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoffer, Megan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLebreton, Carole|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWerther, Mortimer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStelzer, Kerstin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUrquhart, Erin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGurlin, Daniela|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-03-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-03-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameSchaeffer2022_Article_MergingOfTheCase2RegionalCoast.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1573-2959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Schaeffer2022_Article_MergingOfTheCase2RegionalCoast.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.