Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33907
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Christopher B | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | van der Pol, Marjon | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Douglas, Elaine | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, David | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | O’Carroll, Ronan E | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Deary, Ian J | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-01T01:03:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-01T01:03:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | e042210 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33907 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in Scotland is 56%. This study examined whether psychological factors were associated with CRC screening uptake. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting This study used data from the Healthy AGeing In Scotland (HAGIS) pilot study, a study designed to be representative of Scottish adults aged 50 years and older. Participants 908 (505 female) Scottish adults aged 50 to 80 years (mean age=65.84, SD=8.24), who took part in the HAGIS study (2016-2017). Primary and secondary outcome measures Self-reported participation in CRC screening was the outcome measure. Logistic regression was used to test whether scores on measures of health literacy, cognitive ability, risk aversion, time preference (e.g., present-oriented or future-oriented), and personality were associated with CRC screening when these psychological factors were entered individually and simultaneously in the same model. Results Controlling for age, age-squared, sex, living arrangement, and sex*living arrangement, a one-point increase in risk aversion (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.85), and present-orientation (OR=0.86, 0.80 to 0.94) was associated with reduced odds of screening. Higher scores on health literacy (OR per one-point increase=1.20, 1.09 to 1.31), cognitive ability (OR per SD increase=1.51, 1.25 to 1.81), and the intellect personality trait (OR per one-point increase=1.05, 1.01 to 1.09) were associated with increased odds of screening. Higher risk aversion was the only psychological variable that was associated with CRC screening participation when all psychological variables were entered in the same models, and remained associated with CRC screening when additionally adjusting for deprivation and education. A backward elimination model retained two psychological variables as correlates of CRC screening; risk aversion and cognitive ability. Conclusion Individuals who are more risk averse are less likely to participate in free, home CRC screening. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_UK |
dc.relation | Fawns-Ritchie C, Miller CB, van der Pol M, Douglas E, Bell D, O’Carroll RE & Deary IJ (2022) Psychological correlates of free colorectal cancer screening uptake in a Scottish sample: A cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open, 12 (2), Art. No.: e042210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042210 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Cancer screening | en_UK |
dc.subject | cognitive ability | en_UK |
dc.subject | personality | en_UK |
dc.subject | health literacy | en_UK |
dc.subject | risk aversion | en_UK |
dc.subject | time | en_UK |
dc.title | Psychological correlates of free colorectal cancer screening uptake in a Scottish sample: A cross-sectional observational study | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-02-01 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042210 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35105557 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | BMJ Open | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2044-6055 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | The Nuffield Foundation | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Medical Research Council | en_UK |
dc.author.email | ronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 01/02/2022 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Aberdeen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Economics | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Economics | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Edinburgh | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000754603900002 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85124060811 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1790887 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-2936-7717 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8540-1126 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-4538-6328 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-01-12 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-01-12 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2022-01-31 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Miller, Christopher B|0000-0002-2936-7717 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | van der Pol, Marjon| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Douglas, Elaine|0000-0001-8540-1126 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Bell, David|0000-0002-4538-6328 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | O’Carroll, Ronan E|0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Deary, Ian J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|The Nuffield Foundation| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Medical Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2022-02-01 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-02-01 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-02-01| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | e042210.full.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 2044-6055 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e042210.full.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 769.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.