Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33857
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps
Author(s): Hill, Matthew J
Greaves, Helen M
Sayer, Carl D
Hassall, Christopher
Milin, Melanie
Milner, Victoria S
Marazzi, Luca
Hall, Ruth
Harper, Lynsey R
Thornhill, Ian
Walton, Richard
Biggs, Jeremy
Ewald, Naomi
Law, Alan
Willby, Nigel
Keywords: aquatic–terrestrial linkages
biodiversity
connectivity
ecosystem services
management
policy
small lentic water bodies
Issue Date: Dec-2021
Date Deposited: 20-Jan-2022
Citation: Hill MJ, Greaves HM, Sayer CD, Hassall C, Milin M, Milner VS, Marazzi L, Hall R, Harper LR, Thornhill I, Walton R, Biggs J, Ewald N, Law A & Willby N (2021) Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps. Ecosphere, 12 (12), Art. No.: e03853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3853
Abstract: Ponds are among the most biodiverse and ecologically important freshwater habitats globally and may provide a significant opportunity to mitigate anthropogenic pressures and reverse the decline of aquatic biodiversity. Ponds also provide important contributions to society through the provision of ecosystem services. Despite the ecological and societal importance of ponds, freshwater research, policy, and conservation have historically focused on larger water bodies, with significant gaps remaining in our understanding and conservation of pond ecosystems. In May 2019, pond researchers and practitioners participated in a workshop to tackle several pond ecology, conservation, and management issues. Nine research themes and 30 research questions were identified during and following the workshop to address knowledge gaps around: (1) pond habitat definition; (2) global and long-term data availability; (3) anthropogenic stressors; (4) aquatic–terrestrial interactions; (5) succession and disturbance; (6) freshwater connectivity; (7) pond monitoring and technological advances; (8) socio-economic factors; and (9) conservation, management, and policy. Key areas for the future inclusion of ponds in environmental and conservation policy were also discussed. Addressing gaps in our fundamental understanding of pond ecosystems will facilitate more effective research-led conservation and management of pondscapes, their inclusion in environmental policy, support the sustainability of ecosystem services, and help address many of the global threats driving the decline in freshwater biodiversity.
DOI Link: 10.1002/ecs2.3853
Rights: © 2021 The Authors. Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Notes: Additional co-authors: James C. White, Robert A. Briers, Kate L. Mathers, Michael J. Jeffries, and Paul J. Wood
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hill-etal-Ecosphere-2021.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.