Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33821
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBudhathoki, Mausamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorZølner, Anetteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Thorkilden_UK
dc.contributor.authorReinbach, Helene Christineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-12T01:03:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-12T01:03:41Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12en_UK
dc.identifier.other104325en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33821-
dc.description.abstractProduct information is capable of steering the consumers’ expectation formation process. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate whether information on production method influence consumers’ preference and liking of smoked salmon. A consumer test was conducted among 92 consumers to determine liking of the smoked salmon on a 7-point hedonic scale before (blind) and after (informed) receiving information about production method (organic, conventional and wild-caught). Further, two explanatory focus group discussions (n = 5 in each group) were conducted to determine consumers’ belief on production method. A linear mixed-effects model analysis indicated that the consumer overall liking of wild-caught smoked salmon significantly increased after production method information was provided, while regarding organic and conventional smoked salmon no significant difference was noted. Post hoc test indicated that organic smoked salmon was significantly more liked than wild-caught smoked salmon (mean difference ± standard error: 0.652 ± 0.19, p < 0.01) in blind condition, however, between organic and conventional smoked salmon no significant difference was noted (-0.032 ± 0.19, p = 0.983). Further, in informed condition, organic smoked salmon was significantly more liked than conventional smoked salmon (0.50 ± 0.19, p < 0.05), however, between organic and wild-caught smoked salmon no significant difference was noted (0.228 ± 0.19, p = 0.452). Relative importance analysis results suggest that liking of taste was the most important contributor (26.84%) to smoked salmon overall liking (p < 0.05, R2 = 74.17%). Focus group discussion revealed that consumer beliefs related to food safety, animal welfare and sustainability as well as purchasing habits seem to influence smoked salmon preferences. Thus, organic aquaculture sector should focus on promoting consumer beliefs by providing reliable information based on scientific evidences that helps differentiates their products with that of conventional and wild-caught smoked salmon. Future studies might investigate other fish species to better understand the role of product method information on consumer preference and liking of fish.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationBudhathoki M, Zølner A, Nielsen T & Reinbach HC (2021) The role of production method information on sensory perception of smoked salmon—A mixed-method study from Denmark. Food Quality and Preference, 94, Art. No.: 104325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104325en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectProduction method informationen_UK
dc.subjectLikingen_UK
dc.subjectBeliefen_UK
dc.subjectSmoked salmonen_UK
dc.subjectMixed methoden_UK
dc.titleThe role of production method information on sensory perception of smoked salmon—A mixed-method study from Denmarken_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1-s2.0-S0950329321002081-main.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104325en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFood Quality and Preferenceen_UK
dc.citation.issn0950-3293en_UK
dc.citation.volume94en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmausam.budhathoki@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date01/07/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Copenhagenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Copenhagenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Copenhagenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Copenhagenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000684889900002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85110762120en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1778302en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4689-2238en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-06-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-01-11en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBudhathoki, Mausam|0000-0003-4689-2238en_UK
local.rioxx.authorZølner, Anette|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNielsen, Thorkild|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReinbach, Helene Christine|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2271-06-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0950329321002081-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0950-3293en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0950329321002081-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.26 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.