Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33809
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sprague, Matthew | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Chau, Tsz Chong | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Givens, David I | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-11T01:08:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-11T01:08:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 195 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33809 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Iodine is an important nutrient for human health and development, with seafood widely acknowledged as a rich source. Demand from the increasing global population has resulted in the availability of a wider range of wild and farmed seafood. Increased aquaculture production, however, has resulted in changes to feed ingredients that affect the nutritional quality of the final product. The present study assessed the iodine contents of wild and farmed seafood available to UK consumers and evaluated its contribution to current dietary iodine intake. Ninety-five seafood types, encompassing marine and freshwater fish and shellfish, of wild and farmed origins, were purchased from UK retailers and analysed. Iodine contents ranged from 427.4 ± 316.1 to 3.0 ± 1.6 µg·100 g−1 flesh wet weight (mean ± SD) in haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio), respectively, being in the order shellfish > marine fish > freshwater fish, with crustaceans, whitefish (Gadiformes) and bivalves contributing the greatest levels. Overall, wild fish tended to exhibit higher iodine concentrations than farmed fish, with the exception of non-fed aquaculture species (bivalves). However, no significant differences were observed between wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and turbot (Psetta maxima). In contrast, farmed European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and seabream (Sparus aurata) presented lower, and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) higher, iodine levels than their wild counterparts, most likely due to the type and inclusion level of feed ingredients used. By following UK dietary guidelines for fish consumption, a portion of the highest oily (Atlantic mackerel, Scomber scombrus) and lean (haddock) fish species would provide two-thirds of the weekly recommended iodine intake (980 µg). In contrast, actual iodine intake from seafood consumption is estimated at only 9.4–18.0% of the UK reference nutrient intake (140 µg·day−1) across different age groups and genders, with females obtaining less than their male equivalents. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | en_UK |
dc.relation | Sprague M, Chau TC & Givens DI (2022) Iodine Content of Wild and Farmed Seafood and Its Estimated Contribution to UK Dietary Iodine Intake. Nutrients, 14 (1), Art. No.: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010195 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Food Science | en_UK |
dc.subject | Nutrition and Dietetics | en_UK |
dc.title | Iodine Content of Wild and Farmed Seafood and Its Estimated Contribution to UK Dietary Iodine Intake | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/nu14010195 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35011067 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Nutrients | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2072-6643 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 31/12/2021 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Institute of Aquaculture | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Reading | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Reading | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000752588000001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85122091046 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1785214 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-0723-2387 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-6754-6935 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-12-28 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-12-28 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2022-01-10 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | paid | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sprague, Matthew|0000-0002-0723-2387 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Chau, Tsz Chong| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Givens, David I|0000-0002-6754-6935 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2022-01-10 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-01-10| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | nutrients-14-00195-v2.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 2072-6643 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Aquaculture Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
nutrients-14-00195-v2.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 931.08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.