Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33792
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoyd Williams, Natalieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorQuilliam, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Benen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGhatani, Roshnien_UK
dc.contributor.authorDickie, Jenniferen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T01:05:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-07T01:05:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04en_UK
dc.identifier.other102448en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33792-
dc.description.abstractToilet-linked anaerobic digesters (TLADs) can provide users with a clean gaseous fuel and a fertiliser product as well as offer waste management services. Socio-cultural resistance towards domestic TLADs, due to the use of human excreta as a feedstock, is often articulated as a finite barrier to adoption. However, no research has specifically investigated the issues associated with TLADs separately from those associated with domestic digesters without toilet connections, consequently, there has been little attempt to discover what motivates users to use TLADs. Drawing on qualitative data from Nepal this paper explores how socio-cultural resistance impacts TLAD adoption and subsequent use of the biogas, and how adoption and transition pathways evolve. We argue that socio-cultural resistance is not a finite barrier to adoption and the opportunity to observe or trial a TLAD can positively influence adoption, especially amongst the older generations. Technical issues affected how TLADs were utilised more than socio-cultural norms and we discuss how socio-technical factors might co-evolve to influence sustainable adoption and use of TLADs. Caste and gender were not found to influence adoption pathways as much as the leadership or ‘risk-taking’ characteristics of specific adopters. Adoption of TLADs can occur within a year of a user first observing or trialling a TLAD; however, most users still do not use biogas for ritual cooking, despite having had a TLAD for many years. Grassroots initiatives that understand the diversity of localised socio-cultural norms will likely be imperative for successful TLAD dissemination.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationBoyd Williams N, Quilliam R, Campbell B, Ghatani R & Dickie J (2022) Taboos, toilets and biogas: Socio-technical pathways to acceptance of a sustainable household technology. Energy Research and Social Science, 86, Art. No.: 102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102448en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectToilet-linked anaerobic digesteren_UK
dc.subjectDomestic biogasen_UK
dc.subjectWaste-to-energyen_UK
dc.subjectEnergy transitionsen_UK
dc.subjectNepalen_UK
dc.subjectSocio-cultural contexten_UK
dc.titleTaboos, toilets and biogas: Socio-technical pathways to acceptance of a sustainable household technologyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2021.102448en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnergy Research and Social Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn2214-6296en_UK
dc.citation.issn2214-6296en_UK
dc.citation.volume86en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailrichard.quilliam@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/12/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDurham Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPurbanchal Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000737074200005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85121306315en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1783748en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7020-4410en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6302-3854en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-11-24en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-11-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-01-05en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoyd Williams, Natalie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorQuilliam, Richard|0000-0001-7020-4410en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCampbell, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGhatani, Roshni|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDickie, Jennifer|0000-0002-6302-3854en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-01-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-01-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWilliams et al 2022.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2214-6296en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Williams et al 2022.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.