Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, Juanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarmarou, Anthonyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLapane, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurf, Elizabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilson, J T Lindsayen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-13T00:01:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-13T00:01:17Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33426-
dc.description.abstractThe eight-point extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) is commonly used as the primary outcome measure in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical trials. The outcome is conventionally collected through a structured interview with the patient alone or together with a caretaker. Despite the fact that using the structured interview questionnaires helps reach agreement in GOSE assessment between raters, significant variation remains among different raters. We introduce an alternate GOSE rating system as an aid in determining GOSE scores, with the objective of reducing inter-rater variation in the primary outcome assessment in TBI trials. Forty-five trauma centers were randomly assigned to three groups to assess GOSE scores on sample cases, using the alternative GOSE rating system coupled with central quality control (Group 1), the alternative system alone (Group 2), or conventional structured interviews (Group 3). The inter-rater variation between an expert and untrained raters was assessed for each group and reported through raw agreement and with weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Groups 2 and 3 without central review yielded inter-rater agreements of 83% (weighted κ = 0.81; 95% CI 0.69, 0.92) and 83% (weighted κ = 0.76, 95% CI 0.63, 0.89), respectively, in GOS scores. In GOSE, the groups had an agreement of 76% (weighted κ = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.89), and 63% (weighted κ = 0.70; 95% CI 0.60, 0.81), respectively. The group using the alternative rating system coupled with central monitoring yielded the highest inter-rater agreement among the three groups in rating GOS (97%; weighted κ = 0.95; 95% CI 0.89, 1.00), and GOSE (97%; weighted κ = 0.97; 95% CI 0.91, 1.00). The alternate system is an improved GOSE rating method that reduces inter-rater variations and provides for the first time, source documentation and structured narratives that allow a thorough central review of information. The data suggest that a collective effort can be made to minimize inter-rater variation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_UK
dc.relationLu J, Marmarou A, Lapane K, Turf E & Wilson JTL (2010) A Method for Reducing Misclassification in the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27 (5), pp. 843-852. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1293en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectclinical trialen_UK
dc.subjectextended Glasgow Outcome Scaleen_UK
dc.subjectinter-rater variationen_UK
dc.subjectmisclassificationen_UK
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injuryen_UK
dc.titleA Method for Reducing Misclassification in the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scoreen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Lu et al 2010_Reducing_misclassification_in_the_Extended_GOS.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/neu.2010.1293en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Neurotraumaen_UK
dc.citation.issn1557-9042en_UK
dc.citation.issn0897-7151en_UK
dc.citation.volume27en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage843en_UK
dc.citation.epage852en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaill.wilson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/03/2010en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVirginia Commonwealth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVirginia Commonwealth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVirginia Commonwealth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVirginia Commonwealth Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000277915400006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77952980749en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid766032en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4113-2328en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-03-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-10-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLu, Juan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarmarou, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLapane, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurf, Elizabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilson, J T Lindsay|0000-0003-4113-2328en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2260-02-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLu et al 2010_Reducing_misclassification_in_the_Extended_GOS.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0897-7151en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lu et al 2010_Reducing_misclassification_in_the_Extended_GOS.pdfFulltext - Published Version550.63 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.