Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33379
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Leopard population density varies across habitats and management strategies in a mixed-use Tanzanian landscape
Author(s): Searle, Charlotte E
Smit, Josephine
Strampelli, Paolo
Mkuburo, Lameck
Ikanda, Dennis
Macdonald, David W
Loveridge, Andrew J
Dickman, Amy J
Contact Email: j.b.smit1@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Carnivore ecology
Population density
Panthera pardus
Spatially explicit capture-recapture
Trophy hunting
Community conservation
Issue Date: May-2021
Date Deposited: 5-Oct-2021
Citation: Searle CE, Smit J, Strampelli P, Mkuburo L, Ikanda D, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ & Dickman AJ (2021) Leopard population density varies across habitats and management strategies in a mixed-use Tanzanian landscape. Biological Conservation, 257, Art. No.: 109120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109120
Abstract: With large carnivores undergoing widespread range contractions across Africa, effective monitoring across mixed-use landscapes should be considered a priority to identify at-risk populations and prioritise conservation actions. We provide the first comparison of leopard population density within different components of a mixed-use landscape in Tanzania, via spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) modelling of camera trap data from the Ruaha-Rungwa landscape in 2018 and 2019. Population density was highest in highly-productive Acacia-Commiphora habitat in the core tourist area of Ruaha National Park (6.81 ± 1.24 leopards per 100 km2). The next highest density (4.23 ± 1.02 per 100 km2) was estimated in similar habitat in a neighbouring community-managed area (Idodi-Pawaga MBOMIPA WMA). Lowest densities were estimated in miombo (Brachystegia-Jubelnardia) woodland habitat, both in a trophy hunting area (Rungwa Game Reserve; 3.36 ± 1.09 per 100 km2) and inside the National Park (3.23 ± 1.25 per 100 km2). Population density was highly correlated with prey abundance, suggesting that variation in leopard density may be primarily driven by availability of prey, which likely varies with habitat types and anthropogenic impacts. Anthropogenic mortality may also have a direct influence on leopard in more impacted areas, but further research is required to investigate this. Our findings show that a hunting area with significant protection investment supports a leopard density comparable to similar habitat in a photographic tourism area. We also provide evidence that community-managed areas have the potential to effectively conserve large carnivore populations at relatively high densities, but may be vulnerable to edge effects.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109120
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
searle2021.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.75 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.