Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33366
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use |
Author(s): | Wilson, J T Lindsay Pettigrew, Laura E L Teasdale, Graham M |
Keywords: | Glasgow Outcome Scale outcome assessment |
Issue Date: | Aug-1998 |
Date Deposited: | 1-Jan-1900 |
Citation: | Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL & Teasdale GM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma, 15 (8), pp. 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 |
Abstract: | The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is the most widely used outcome measure after traumatic brain injury, but it is increasingly recognized to have important limitations. It is proposed that shortcomings of the GOS can be addressed by adopting a standard format for the interview used to assign outcome. A set of guidelines are outlined that are directed at the main problems encountered in applying the GOS. The guidelines cover the general principles underlying the use of the GOS and common practical problems of applying the scale. Structured interview schedules are described for both the five-point GOS and an extended eight-point GOS (GOSE). An interrater reliability study of the structured interviews for the GOS and GOSE yielded weighted kappa values of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. It is concluded that assessment of the GOS using a standard format with a written protocol is practical and reliable. |
DOI Link: | 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 |
Rights: | Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GOSE.pdf | Supporting Information | 141.13 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Wilson 1998 Structured Interviews for the GOS and GOSE Guidelines.PDF | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 40.52 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.