Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33285
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHornsby, Mark A Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHurly, T Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Caitlin Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorPritchard, David Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Susan Den_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T00:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-10T00:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33285-
dc.description.abstractIn the laboratory, many species orient themselves using the geometric properties of an enclosure or array and geometric information is often preferred over visual cues. Whether animals use geometric cues when relocating rewarded locations in the wild, however, has rarely been investigated. We presented free-living rufous hummingbirds with a rectangular array of four artificial flowers to investigate learning of rewarded locations using geometric cues. In one treatment, we rewarded two of four flowers at diagonally opposite corners. In a second treatment, we provided a visual cue to the rewarded flower by connecting the flowers with “walls” consisting of four dowels (three white, one blue) laid on the ground connecting each of the flowers. Neither treatment elicited classical geometry results; instead, hummingbirds typically chose one particular flower over all others. When we exchanged that flower with another, hummingbirds tended to visit the original flower. These results suggest that (1) hummingbirds did not use geometric cues, but instead may have used a visually derived cue on the flowers themselves, and (2) using geometric cues may have been more difficult than using visual characteristics. Although hummingbirds typically prefer spatial over visual information, we hypothesize that they will not use geometric cues over stable visual features but that they make use of small, flower-specific visual cues. Such cues may play a more important role in foraging decisions than previously thought.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationHornsby MAW, Hurly TA, Hamilton CE, Pritchard DJ & Healy SD (2014) Wild, free-living rufous hummingbirds do not use geometric cues in a spatial task. Behavioural Processes, 108, pp. 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.003en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectGeometryen_UK
dc.subjectSelasphorus rufusen_UK
dc.subjectVisual featuresen_UK
dc.subjectSpatial orientationen_UK
dc.subjectNavigationen_UK
dc.titleWild, free-living rufous hummingbirds do not use geometric cues in a spatial tasken_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1-s2.0-S0376635714002447-main.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.003en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25452077en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBehavioural Processesen_UK
dc.citation.issn0376-6357en_UK
dc.citation.volume108en_UK
dc.citation.spage138en_UK
dc.citation.epage141en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.pritchard@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/10/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lethbridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lethbridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000347599800021en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84911129343en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1503186en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7554-3470en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-10-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-10-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-09-09en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHornsby, Mark A W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHurly, T Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHamilton, Caitlin E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPritchard, David J|0000-0001-7554-3470en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHealy, Susan D|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of St Andrews|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000740en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2264-09-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0376635714002447-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0376-6357en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0376635714002447-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version603.84 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.