Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHattam, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBöhnke-Henrichs, Anneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBörger, Tobiasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurdon, Darylen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHadjimichael, Mariaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Alyneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAtkins, Jonathan Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGarrard, Samanthaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAusten, Melanie Cen_UK
dc.description.abstractA mixed-method approach was used to assess and value the ecosystem services derived from the Dogger Bank, an extensive shallow sandbank in the southern North Sea. Three parallel studies were undertaken that 1) identified and quantified, where possible, how indicators for ecosystem service provision may change according to two future scenarios, 2) assessed members of the public's willingness-to-pay for improvements to a small number of ecosystem services as a consequence of a hypothetical management plan, and 3) facilitated a process of deliberation that allowed members of the public to explore the uses of the Dogger Bank and the conflicts and dilemmas involved in its management. Each of these studies was designed to answer different and specific research questions and therefore contributes different insights about the ecosystem services delivered by the Dogger Bank. This paper explores what can be gained by bringing these findings together post hoc and the extent to which the different methods are complementary. Findings suggest that mixed-method research brings more understanding than can be gained from the individual approaches alone. Nevertheless, the choice of methods used and how these methods are implemented strongly affects the results obtained.en_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationHattam C, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Börger T, Burdon D, Hadjimichael M, Delaney A, Atkins JP, Garrard S & Austen MC (2015) Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?. Ecological Economics, 120, pp. 126-138.
dc.rightsAccepted refereed manuscript of: Hattam C, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Börger T, Burdon D, Hadjimichael M, Delaney A, Atkins JP, Garrard S & Austen MC (2015) Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?. Ecological Economics, 120, pp. 126-138. © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_UK
dc.subjectDogger Banken_UK
dc.titleIntegrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcological Economicsen_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Community's Seventh Framework Programmeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPlymouth Marine Laboratoryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWageningen Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPlymouth Marine Laboratoryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAalborg Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAalborg Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPlymouth Marine Laboratoryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPlymouth Marine Laboratoryen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHattam, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBöhnke-Henrichs, Anne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBörger, Tobias|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurdon, Daryl|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHadjimichael, Maria|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDelaney, Alyne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAtkins, Jonathan P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGarrard, Samantha|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAusten, Melanie C|en_UK
local.rioxx.project266445|European Community's Seventh Framework Programme|en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hattam-etal-EE-2015.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version613.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.