Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33239
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, Abigailen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRugg, Tessaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNoel, Melanieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Sharonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Abbieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T00:14:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T00:14:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12en_UK
dc.identifier.other100072en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33239-
dc.description.abstractQualitative data collection is increasingly occurring online, with data collection methods often lacking the synchronous contact between researchers and participants present in more traditional methods of qualitative data collection such as face-to-face interviews. Despite numerous benefits of non-synchronous online methods of qualitative data collection, such methods also pose unique challenges concerning participant eligibility and data quality in the qualitative domain. Due to a longer tradition of conducting non-synchronous quantitative online data collection, researchers have discussed issues related to data quality for use within quantitative research, and developed techniques to address such issues. However, such discussions have not taken place within qualitative research and due to the differences in types of data and theoretical underpinnings, only some of the techniques developed in quantitative research can be appropriately applied in qualitative research. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap by providing an important ‘how to guide’, presenting techniques to help address threats to data quality and integrity in non-synchronous online qualitative research. We start by outlining techniques developed for use in quantitative research that can be appropriately transferred to qualitative paradigms, before proposing techniques to manage challenges faced specifically by non-synchronous online qualitative research. We go on to discuss some of the potential pitfalls which can prevent the implementation of these techniques and how to overcome them. Finally, we urge researchers to be transparent about the techniques they implement to optimise data quality and to adopt a proactive rather than reactive approach to maximising data quality in qualitative research studies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationJones A, Caes L, Rugg T, Noel M, Bateman S & Jordan A (2021) Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods. Methods in Psychology, 5, Art. No.: 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 7.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectQualityen_UK
dc.subjectFrauden_UK
dc.subjectOnlineen_UK
dc.titleChallenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methodsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleMethods in Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2590-2601en_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderPain Relief Foundationen_UK
dc.citation.date02/09/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Calgaryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1752675en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9315-0857en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1595-5574en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-08-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-09-06en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Abigail|0000-0001-9315-0857en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRugg, Tessa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNoel, Melanie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBateman, Sharon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJordan, Abbie|0000-0003-1595-5574en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Pain Relief Foundation|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000323en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-09-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2021-09-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S2590260121000291-main (1).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2590-2601en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2590260121000291-main (1).pdfFulltext - Published Version388.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.