Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33078
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Broome, Alice | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Inchboard, Lauren L | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Perks, Mike | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Clarke, Toni-Kim | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Kirsty J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Richard | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-12T00:05:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-12T00:05:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 58 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33078 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Key message Epiphytic lichens of remnant Atlantic oakwood trees, enclosed within a recently planted conifer matrix, show ability to survive early stages of woodland restoration (conifer removal). Context Atlantic oakwood, ancient semi-natural woodland (ASNW), supports important epiphytic lichens. Fragmented ASNW, historically in-filled with conifers, are now being restored to reflect ASNW tree and ground flora character. Concerns exist that sudden and total removal of the conifer matrix will be detrimental to the epiphyte diversity of remnant trees retained within the former plantation. Aims Here, we ask whether an unintended consequence of habitat restoration is the loss of epiphyte populations on remnant trees. Methods Dynamics of ground flora development were studied at one 50-ha site on the west coast of Scotland using indicator species occurrence and species traits. Change in cover of lichen species was determined and lichen vitality was assessed in two Lobaria species using chlorophyll fluorescence as a proxy. Assessments pre-, post- and nine years after conifer removal were made in plantation areas (containing remnant oak trees) and ASNW areas. Results Re-vegetation of the ground flora was predominantly by ASNW vegetation. Species richness and occurrence of native woodland indicator species increased and the community showed stronger competitor traits. Lichen vitality was initially reduced but recovered. Tests showed change in the abundance of key lichen species and lichen community diversity was non-significant despite the loss of four lichen species on remnant trees. Conclusion Ground flora dynamics indicate site recovery was underway within eight years of restoration activities and epiphytic lichens although variable in response were in this study largely unaffected, this restoration approach could be appropriate for other Atlantic oakwoods where lichen conservation is an objective. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_UK |
dc.relation | Broome A, Inchboard LL, Perks M, Clarke T, Park KJ & Thompson R (2021) Can epiphytic lichens of remnant Atlantic oakwood trees in a planted ancient woodland site survive early stages of woodland restoration?. Annals of Forest Science, 78 (3), Art. No.: 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01069-w | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Annals of Forest Science. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01069-w | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf | en_UK |
dc.subject | ASNW | en_UK |
dc.subject | PAWS | en_UK |
dc.subject | Restoration | en_UK |
dc.subject | Lichen | en_UK |
dc.subject | Conservation | en_UK |
dc.subject | Species traits | en_UK |
dc.title | Can epiphytic lichens of remnant Atlantic oakwood trees in a planted ancient woodland site survive early stages of woodland restoration? | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-06-23 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Broome et al 2021_lichensrestoration.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13595-021-01069-w | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Annals of Forest Science | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1297-966X | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1286-4560 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 78 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | NA - Not Applicable (or Unknown) | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Forestry Commission (Scotland) | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Woodland Trust | en_UK |
dc.author.email | k.j.park@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 22/06/2021 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biological and Environmental Sciences | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Montpellier SupAgro | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Forest Research | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Forest Research | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biological and Environmental Sciences | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Forest and Land Scotland | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000664479500001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85108834516 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1745388 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-6080-7197 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-05-10 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-05-10 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2021-08-11 | en_UK |
dc.subject.tag | Environmental Change | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Broome, Alice| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Inchboard, Lauren L| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Perks, Mike| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Clarke, Toni-Kim| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Park, Kirsty J|0000-0001-6080-7197 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Thompson, Richard| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Woodland Trust|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012152 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Forestry Commission (Scotland)| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2022-06-23 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-06-22 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2022-06-23| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Broome et al 2021_lichensrestoration.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 2 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1297-966X | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Broome et al 2021_Supplementary_lichensrestoration.pdf | Supporting Information | 428.03 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Broome et al 2021_lichensrestoration.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 5.4 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.