Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33066
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Monicaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGlynn, Liam Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Gerard Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Hannahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Brien, Eoinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDolan, Eamonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Andrew Wen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T00:05:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-11T00:05:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33066-
dc.description.abstractBackground To confirm treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH), ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) must exclude white-coat hypertension (WCH), three or more medications should be prescribed at the optimal doses tolerated, and non-adherence and lifestyle should be examined. Most previous studies have not adequately considered pseudo-resistance and merely provide an apparent TRH (aTRH) prevalence figure. Aim To conduct a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of aTRH in general practice, and then consider pseudo-resistance and morbidity. Design and setting With support, 16 practices ran an anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) drug search, identifying patients on any possible hypertensive medications, and then a search of individual patients’ electronic records took place. Method ABPM was used to rule out WCH. The World Health Organization-defined daily dosing guidelines determined adequate dosing. Adherence was defined as whether patients requested nine or more repeat monthly prescriptions within the past year. Results Sixteen practices participated (n = 50 172), and 646 patients had aTRH. Dosing was adequate in 19% of patients, 84% were adherent to medications, as defined by prescription refill, and 43% had ever had an ABPM. Using a BP cut-off of 140/90 mmHg, the prevalence of aTRH was 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.0 to 10.0). Consideration of pseudo-resistance further reduced prevalence rates to 3% (95% CI = 3.0 to 4.0). Conclusion Reviewing individual patient records results in a lower estimate of prevalence of TRH than has been previously reported. Further consideration for individual patients of pseudo-resistance additionally lowers these estimates, and may be all that is required for management in the vast majority of cases.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_UK
dc.relationHayes P, Casey M, Glynn LG, Molloy GJ, Durand H, O’Brien E, Dolan E, Newell J & Murphy AW (2018) Prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension after considering pseudo-resistance and morbidity: a cross-sectional study in Irish primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 68 (671), pp. e394-e400. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x696221en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectadherenceen_UK
dc.subjectcross-sectional studiesen_UK
dc.subjectdosingen_UK
dc.subjecthypertensionen_UK
dc.subjectprimary careen_UK
dc.subjectpseudo-resistancesen_UK
dc.titlePrevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension after considering pseudo-resistance and morbidity: a cross-sectional study in Irish primary careen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[e394.full.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp18x696221en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29739776en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of General Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1478-5242en_UK
dc.citation.issn0960-1643en_UK
dc.citation.volume68en_UK
dc.citation.issue671en_UK
dc.citation.spagee394en_UK
dc.citation.epagee400en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Boarden_UK
dc.author.emailhannah.durand@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date08/05/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Limerick, Irelanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Dublin (UCD)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Dublin (UCD)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000442323400002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85048211647en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1745981en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8761-0519en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-01-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-08-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHayes, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCasey, Monica|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGlynn, Liam G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMolloy, Gerard J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDurand, Hannah|0000-0002-8761-0519en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO’Brien, Eoin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDolan, Eamon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNewell, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMurphy, Andrew W|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Health Research Board|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010414en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2268-04-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee394.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1478-5242en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e394.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version110.96 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.