Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Policy Documents
Title: Scottish Youth Justice and the Legacy of Kilbrandon: a provocation paper
Author(s): Donnelly, Michelle
Contact Email:
Issue Date: 4-May-2020
Date Deposited: 2-Jul-2020
Publisher: British Academy
Citation: Donnelly M (2020) Scottish Youth Justice and the Legacy of Kilbrandon: a provocation paper. The British Academy. Reframing Childhood Past and Present.
Series/Report no.: Reframing Childhood Past and Present
Abstract: First paragraph: Although consolidated under the same political union, the four nations of the United Kingdom take different legal approaches in response to youth offending. Scotland has, since the 1970s, followed a distinctly welfare-based approach through its unique tribunal system of children’s hearings: where decisions are made in the best interests of children who commit criminal offences.[i] The children’s hearings system (CHS) was established on the basis of the Kilbrandon Report[ii], which remains influential to its current operation. The Report determined that all children in need of compulsory state intervention, for whatever reason, should be subject to the same system and treated on the same welfare basis, in light of common adversities, circumstances and (unmet) needs. The wisdom of Kilbrandon in this regard has since been vindicated by a wealth of empirical evidence on the lived experience of children subject to state intervention, which confirms the links between adversity, vulnerability, and offending behaviour.[iii] Although the Kilbrandon Report has a lasting legacy in Scots law and policy, not all children enjoy similar treatment in practice. There are contradictions in approach towards some children, particularly those who offend. This provocation paper explores the uniquely Scottish approach to youth justice by reflecting on the legacy of Kilbrandon and highlighting inconsistencies towards the treatment of some children who come into contact with the Scottish youth justice system. It concludes by arguing that the identified contradictions could be resolved by raising the age of criminal responsibility to the cusp of adulthood.
Type: Policy Document
Rights: Author retains copyright. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.
Affiliation: Law
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
British Academy Provocation Paper - Scottish youth justice 080420 - final proof.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version871.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.