Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32718
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Psychometric Characteristics of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Applied in the CENTER-TBI Study
Author(s): von Steinbuechel, Nicole
Rauen, Katrin
Bockhop, Fabian
Covic, Amra
Krenz, Ugne
Plass, Anne Marie
Cunitz, Katrin
Polinder, Suzanne
Wilson, Lindsay
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Maas, Andrew I R
Menon, David
Wu, Yi-Jhen
Zeldovich, Marina
Keywords: psychometric properties
patient-reported outcome measures
traumatic brain injury
classical test theory
Issue Date: Jun-2021
Date Deposited: 15-Jun-2021
Citation: von Steinbuechel N, Rauen K, Bockhop F, Covic A, Krenz U, Plass AM, Cunitz K, Polinder S, Wilson L, Steyerberg EW, Maas AIR, Menon D, Wu Y & Zeldovich M (2021) Psychometric Characteristics of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Applied in the CENTER-TBI Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10 (11), Art. No.: 2396. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112396
Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may lead to impairments in various outcome domains. Since most instruments assessing these are only available in a limited number of languages, psychometrically validated translations are important for research and clinical practice. Thus, our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) applied in the CENTER-TBI study. The study sample comprised individuals who filled in the six-months assessments (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PCL-5, RPQ, QOLIBRI/-OS, SF-36v2/-12v2). Classical psychometric characteristics were investigated and compared with those of the original English versions. The reliability was satisfactory to excellent; the instruments were comparable to each other and to the original versions. Validity analyses demonstrated medium to high correlations with well-established measures. The original factor structure was replicated by all the translations, except for the RPQ, SF-36v2/-12v2 and some language samples for the PCL-5, most probably due to the factor structure of the original instruments. The translation of one to two items of the PHQ-9, RPQ, PCL-5, and QOLIBRI in three languages could be improved in the future to enhance scoring and application at the individual level. Researchers and clinicians now have access to reliable and valid instruments to improve outcome assessment after TBI in national and international health care.
DOI Link: 10.3390/jcm10112396
Rights: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jcm-10-02396-v2.pdfFulltext - Published Version896.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.