Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32601
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Johnsonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarino, Armandoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Vahiden_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T00:04:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-11T00:04:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other1753en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32601-
dc.description.abstractIcebergs represent hazards to ships and maritime activities and therefore their detection is essential. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites are very useful for this, due to their capability to acquire data under cloud cover and during day and night passes. In this work, we compared six state-of-the-art polarimetric target detectors to test their performance and ability to detect small-sized icebergs < 120 m in four locations in Greenland. We used four single-look complex (SLC) ALOS-2 quad-polarimetric images from JAXA for quad-polarimetric detection and we compared with dual-polarimetric detectors using only the channels HH and HV. We also compared these detectors with single-polarimetric intensity channels and we tested using two scenarios: open ocean and sea ice. Our results show that the multi-look polarimetric whitening filter (MPWF) and the optimal polarimetric detector (OPD) provide the most optimal performance in quad- and dual-polarimetric mode detection. The analysis shows that, overall, quad-polarimetric detectors provide the best detection performance. When the false alarm rate (PF) is fixed to 10−5, the probabilities of detection (PD) are 0.99 in open ocean and 0.90 in sea ice. Dual-polarimetric or single-polarimetric detectors show an overall reduction in performance (the ROC curves show a decrease), but this degradation is not very large (< 0.1) when the value of false alarms is relatively high (i.e., we are interested in bigger icebergs with a brighter backscattering > 120 m, as they are easier to detect). However, the differences between quad- and dual- or single-polarimetric detectors became much more evident when the PF value was fixed to low detection probabilities 10−6 (i.e., smaller icebergs). In the single-polarimetric mode, the HV channel showed PD values of 0.62 for open ocean and 0.26 for sea ice, compared to values of 0.81 (open ocean) and 0.77 (sea ice) obtained with quad-polarimetric detectors.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationBailey J, Marino A & Akbari V (2021) Comparison of Target Detectors to Identify Icebergs in Quad-Polarimetric L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar Data. Remote Sensing, 13 (9), Art. No.: 1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091753en_UK
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectdetectionen_UK
dc.subjecticebergsen_UK
dc.subjectsea iceen_UK
dc.subjectpolarimetryen_UK
dc.subjectSARen_UK
dc.titleComparison of Target Detectors to Identify Icebergs in Quad-Polarimetric L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar Dataen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs13091753en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRemote Sensingen_UK
dc.citation.issn2072-4292en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue9en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderJapan Aerospace Exploration Agencyen_UK
dc.author.emailarmando.marino@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/04/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationComputing Scienceen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000650754200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85105587480en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1726966en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4531-3102en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9621-8180en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-04-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-05-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBailey, Johnson|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarino, Armando|0000-0002-4531-3102en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAkbari, Vahid|0000-0002-9621-8180en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004020en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-05-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-05-10|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameremotesensing-13-01753-v2.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2072-4292en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
remotesensing-13-01753-v2.pdfFulltext - Published Version82.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.