Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32573
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Interspecific and intraspecific variation in leaf toughness of Arctic plants in relation to habitat and nutrient supply |
Author(s): | Fetcher, Ned Iglesia, Sofia Turner, Stephen J Parker, Thomas C |
Contact Email: | t.c.parker@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | leaf toughness Arctic tundra intraspecific variation Eriophorum vaginatum latitudinal gradient |
Issue Date: | 28-Apr-2021 |
Date Deposited: | 29-Apr-2021 |
Citation: | Fetcher N, Iglesia S, Turner SJ & Parker TC (2021) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in leaf toughness of Arctic plants in relation to habitat and nutrient supply. Arctic Science. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0016 |
Abstract: | Leaf toughness is an important functional trait that confers resistance to herbivory and mechanical damage. We sought to determine how species composition, climate, seasonality, and nutrient availability influence leaf toughness in two types of tundra in northern Alaska. We measured leaf toughness as force to punch for 11 species of Arctic plants in tussock tundra and dry heath tundra at 17 sites distributed along a latitudinal gradient. Rubus chamaemorus and the graminoids occupied opposite ends of the leaf toughness spectrum, with R. chamaemorus requiring the least force to punch, while one of the graminoids, Eriophorum vaginatum, required the most. Leaf toughness increased with mean summer temperature for E. vaginatum and Betula nana, while it declined with warmer temperatures for the other species. Toughness of mature leaves of E. vaginatum did not vary through the growing season but declined significantly after senescence. Application of N and P fertilizer in an experimental site decreased leaf toughness in three species but had no effect on four others. Leaf toughness of four out of five species in dry heath was greater than for the same species in tussock tundra, but there was no difference in community-weighted mean toughness between tussock tundra and dry heath. |
DOI Link: | 10.1139/as-2020-0016 |
Rights: | Copyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
Notes: | Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
as-2020-0016.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 360.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.