Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32485
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Robin Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorBanin, Lindsay Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurslem, David F R Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Daniel Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhilipson, Christopher Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorCutler, Mark E Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Glenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNilus, Reubenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDent, Daisy Hen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-30T00:02:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-30T00:02:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-15en_UK
dc.identifier.other119036en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32485-
dc.description.abstractSelective logging has affected large areas of tropical forests and there is increasing interest in how to manage selectively logged forests to enhance recovery. However, the impacts of logging and active restoration, by liberation cutting and enrichment planting, on tree community composition are poorly understood compared to trajectories of biomass recovery. Here, we assess the long-term impacts of selective logging and active restoration for biomass recovery on tree species diversity, community composition, and forest structure. We censused all stems ≥2 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) on 46 permanent plots in unlogged, primary forest in the Danum Valley Conservation Area (DVCA; 12 plots, totalling 0.6 ha) and in sites logged 23–35 years prior to the census in the Ulu Segama Forest Reserve adjacent to DVCA (34 plots, totalling 1.7 ha) in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Active restoration treatments, including enrichment planting and climber cutting, were implemented on 17 of the logged forest plots 12–24 years prior to the census. Total plot-level basal area and pole (5–10 cm DBH) stem density were lower in logged than unlogged forests, however no difference was found in stem density amongst saplings (2–5 cm DBH) or established trees (≥10 cm DBH). Neither basal area, nor plot-level stem density varied with time since logging at any size class, although sapling and pole stem densities were lower in actively restored than naturally regenerating logged forest. Sapling species diversity was lower in logged than unlogged forest, however there were no other significant effects of logging on tree species richness or diversity indices. Tree species composition, however, differed between logged and unlogged forests across all stem size classes (PERMANOVA), reflected by 23 significant indicator species that were only present in unlogged forest. PERMANOVA tests revealed no evidence that overall species composition changed with time since logging or with active restoration treatments at any size class. However, when naturally regenerating and actively restored communities were compared, two indicator species were identified in naturally regenerating forest and three in actively restored forests. Together our results suggest that selective logging has a lasting effect on tree community composition regardless of active restoration treatments and, even when species richness and diversity are stable, species composition remains distinct from unlogged forest for more than two decades post-harvest. Active restoration efforts should be targeted, monitored, and refined to try to ensure positive outcomes for multiple metrics of forest recovery.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationHayward RM, Banin LF, Burslem DFRP, Chapman DS, Philipson CD, Cutler MEJ, Reynolds G, Nilus R & Dent DH (2021) Three decades of post-logging tree community recovery in naturally regenerating and actively restored dipterocarp forest in Borneo. Forest Ecology and Management, 488, Art. No.: 119036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119036en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSelective loggingen_UK
dc.subjectTropical foresten_UK
dc.subjectLowland rain foresten_UK
dc.subjectSilvicultureen_UK
dc.subjectEnrichment plantingen_UK
dc.subjectSpecies diversityen_UK
dc.titleThree decades of post-logging tree community recovery in naturally regenerating and actively restored dipterocarp forest in Borneoen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119036en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleForest Ecology and Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn0378-1127en_UK
dc.citation.volume488en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCarnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date26/02/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSouth East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership (SEARRP)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationForestry Department Sabah, Malaysiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000632313100004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85101531867en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1710775en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9653-225Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1168-3914en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1219-7344en_UK
dc.date.accepted2021-02-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-02-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-03-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHayward, Robin M|0000-0002-9653-225Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBanin, Lindsay F|0000-0002-1168-3914en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurslem, David F R P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Daniel S|0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhilipson, Christopher D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCutler, Mark E J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReynolds, Glen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNilus, Reuben|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDent, Daisy H|0000-0002-1219-7344en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-03-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-03-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0378112721001250-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0378-1127en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0378112721001250-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.