Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32287
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrench, David Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHawkes, Rhiannon Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorBower, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Elaineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T01:14:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-17T01:14:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32287-
dc.description.abstractBackground The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP) has been delivered by four commercial organizations across England, to prevent people with impaired glucose tolerance developing Type 2 diabetes. Evidence reviews underpinning the NHS-DPP design specification identified 19 Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) that are the intervention “active ingredients.” It is important to understand the discrepancies between BCTs specified in design and BCTs actually delivered. Purpose To compare observed fidelity of delivery of BCTs that were delivered to (a) the NHS-DPP design specification, and (b) the programme manuals of four provider organizations. Methods Audio-recordings were made of complete delivery of NHS-DPP courses at eight diverse sites (two courses per provider organization). The eight courses consisted of 111 group sessions, with 409 patients and 35 facilitators. BCT Taxonomy v1 was used to reliably code the contents of NHS-DPP design specification documents, programme manuals for each provider organization, and observed NHS-DPP group sessions. Results The NHS-DPP design specification indicated 19 BCTs that should be delivered, whereas only seven (37%) were delivered during the programme in all eight courses. By contrast, between 70% and 89% of BCTs specified in programme manuals were delivered. There was substantial under-delivery of BCTs that were designed to improve self-regulation of behavior, for example, those involving problem solving and self-monitoring of behavior. Conclusions A lack of fidelity in delivery to the underlying evidence base was apparent, due to poor translation of design specification to programme manuals. By contrast, the fidelity of delivery to the programme manuals was relatively good. Future commissioning should focus on ensuring the evidence base is more accurately translated into the programme manual contents.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_UK
dc.relationFrench DP, Hawkes RE, Bower P & Cameron E (2021) Is the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme Intervention Delivered as Planned? An Observational Study of Fidelity of Intervention Delivery. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55 (11), pp. 1104-1115. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa108en_UK
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.comen_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectType 2 diabetesen_UK
dc.subjectDiabetes prevention programmeen_UK
dc.subjectNondiabetic hyperglycemiaen_UK
dc.subjectintervention fidelityen_UK
dc.subjectBehavior changeen_UK
dc.subjectBehavior change techniquesen_UK
dc.titleIs the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme Intervention Delivered as Planned? An Observational Study of Fidelity of Intervention Deliveryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/abm/kaaa108en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33580647en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAnnals of Behavioral Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1532-4796en_UK
dc.citation.issn0883-6612en_UK
dc.citation.volume55en_UK
dc.citation.issue11en_UK
dc.citation.spage1104en_UK
dc.citation.epage1115en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date13/02/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Manchesteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Manchesteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Manchesteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000715382800006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85100303528en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1705541en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7663-7804en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8959-5148en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-10-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-02-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrench, David P|0000-0002-7663-7804en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHawkes, Rhiannon E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBower, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCameron, Elaine|0000-0002-8959-5148en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-02-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2021-02-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamekaaa108.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1532-4796en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
kaaa108.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.