Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31987
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHampson, Katieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVentura, Francescoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSteenson, Rachelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMancy, Rebeccaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTrotter, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Lauraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAbela-Ridder, Bernadetteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKnopf, Leaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRingenier, Monieken_UK
dc.contributor.authorTenzin, Tenzinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLy, Sowathen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTarantola, Arnauden_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoyengar, Ronelngaren_UK
dc.contributor.authorOussiguéré, Assandien_UK
dc.contributor.authorBonfoh, Bassirouen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T01:07:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-21T01:07:42Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31987-
dc.description.abstractBackground Tens of thousands of people die from dog-mediated rabies annually. Deaths can be prevented through post-exposure prophylaxis for people who have been bitten, and the disease eliminated through dog vaccination. Current post-exposure prophylaxis use saves many lives, but availability remains poor in many rabies-endemic countries due to high costs, poor access, and supply. Methods We developed epidemiological and economic models to investigate the effect of an investment in post-exposure prophylaxis by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. We modelled post-exposure prophylaxis use according to the status quo, with improved access using WHO-recommended intradermal vaccination, with and without rabies immunoglobulin, and with and without dog vaccination. We took the health provider perspective, including only direct costs. Findings We predict more than 1 million deaths will occur in the 67 rabies-endemic countries considered from 2020 to 2035, under the status quo. Current post-exposure prophylaxis use prevents approximately 56 000 deaths annually. Expanded access to, and free provision of, post-exposure prophylaxis would prevent an additional 489 000 deaths between 2020 and 2035. Under this switch to efficient intradermal post-exposure prophylaxis regimens, total projected vaccine needs remain similar (about 73 million vials) yet 17·4 million more people are vaccinated, making this an extremely cost-effective method, with costs of US$635 per death averted and $33 per disability-adjusted life-years averted. Scaling up dog vaccination programmes could eliminate dog-mediated rabies over this time period; improved post-exposure prophylaxis access remains cost-effective under this scenario, especially in combination with patient risk assessments to reduce unnecessary post-exposure prophylaxis use. Interpretation Investing in post-exposure vaccines would be an extremely cost-effective intervention that could substantially reduce disease burden and catalyse dog vaccination efforts to eliminate dog-mediated rabies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationHampson K, Ventura F, Steenson R, Mancy R, Trotter C, Cooper L, Abela-Ridder B, Knopf L, Ringenier M, Tenzin T, Ly S, Tarantola A, Moyengar R, Oussiguéré A & Bonfoh B (2019) The potential effect of improved provision of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Gavi-eligible countries: a modelling study. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19 (1), pp. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099%2818%2930512-7en_UK
dc.rights© This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.titleThe potential effect of improved provision of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Gavi-eligible countries: a modelling studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30512-7en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30472178en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleLancet Infectious Diseasesen_UK
dc.citation.issn1474-4457en_UK
dc.citation.issn1473-3099en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage102en_UK
dc.citation.epage111en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderWellcome Trusten_UK
dc.citation.date21/11/2018en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-authors: D. H. Ashwath Narayana, M. K. Sudarshan, Athman Mwatondo, Matthew Muturi, Gati Wambura, Glenn T Edosoa, Soa Fy Andriamandimby, Laurence Baril, Abdallah Traoré, Sarah Jayme, Johann Kotzé, Amila Gunesekera, Nakul Chitnis, Jan Hattendorf, Mirjam Laager, Monique Lechenne, Jakob Zinsstag, Joel Changalucha, Zac Mtema, Ahmed Lugelo, Kennedy Lushasi, Onphirul Yurachai, Charlotte Jessica E. Metcalf, Malavika Rajeev, Jesse Blanton, Galileu Barbosa Costa, Nandini Sreenivasan, Ryan Wallace, Deborah Briggs, Louise Taylor, Samuel M Thumbi, Nguyen Thi Thanh Huongen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWorld Health Organizationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWorld Health Organizationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWorld Health Organizationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMinistry of Agriculture & Forestsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Pasteur Institute of Cambodiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Pasteur Institute of Cambodiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre de Support en Santé Internationalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développementen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre Suisse des Recherche Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire (CSRS)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000453926700043en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85059241333en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1678839en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1579-6596en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-08-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-08-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-11-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHampson, Katie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVentura, Francesco|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSteenson, Rachel|0000-0002-1579-6596en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMancy, Rebecca|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTrotter, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCooper, Laura|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAbela-Ridder, Bernadette|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKnopf, Lea|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRingenier, Moniek|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTenzin, Tenzin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLy, Sowath|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTarantola, Arnaud|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoyengar, Ronelngar|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOussiguéré, Assandi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBonfoh, Bassirou|en_UK
local.rioxx.project207569/Z/17/Z|Wellcome Trust|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-11-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|2020-11-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePIIS1473309918305127.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1474-4457en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PIIS1473309918305127.pdfFulltext - Published Version427.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.