Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31937
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorton, F Blakeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan-Smith, Hannah Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrosnan, Sarah Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThierry, Bernarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorPaukner, Annikaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEssler, Jennifer Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarcum, Christopher Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Phyllis Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T01:02:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-13T01:02:01Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31937-
dc.description.abstractLarge-scale studies of individual differences in animal innovation are rare firstly because discovery behaviour itself is often rare, and secondly because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple groups and locations. Here we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study innovative behaviour in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behaviour, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in close proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovated were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Sociality, task motivation, and age all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance and group size were non-significant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioural observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may therefore be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation, and our findings highlight in particular several possible scenarios through which innovative behaviour might be selected for among capuchins.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_UK
dc.relationMorton FB, Buchanan-Smith HM, Brosnan SF, Thierry B, Paukner A, Essler JL, Marcum CS & Lee PC (2021) Studying animal innovation at the individual level: A ratings-based assessment in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 135 (2), pp. 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000264en_UK
dc.rights©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000264en_UK
dc.titleStudying animal innovation at the individual level: A ratings-based assessment in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/com0000264en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid33464107en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Comparative Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1939-2087en_UK
dc.citation.issn0735-7036en_UK
dc.citation.volume135en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage258en_UK
dc.citation.epage265en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.citation.date18/01/2021en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorgia State Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNottingham Trent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Pennsylvaniaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Institutes of Health (US)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000668221900012en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85109187532en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1680328en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2516-7734en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4296-3513en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-10-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-11-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorton, F Blake|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBuchanan-Smith, Hannah M|0000-0002-2516-7734en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrosnan, Sarah F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThierry, Bernard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPaukner, Annika|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEssler, Jennifer L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarcum, Christopher S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Phyllis C|0000-0002-4296-3513en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-11-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-11-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMorton et al J Comp Psych 2020.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1939-2087en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Morton et al J Comp Psych 2020.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version577.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.