Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31937
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Morton, F Blake | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Brosnan, Sarah F | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Thierry, Bernard | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Paukner, Annika | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Essler, Jennifer L | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Marcum, Christopher S | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Phyllis C | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-13T01:02:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-13T01:02:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31937 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Large-scale studies of individual differences in animal innovation are rare firstly because discovery behaviour itself is often rare, and secondly because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple groups and locations. Here we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study innovative behaviour in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behaviour, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in close proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovated were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Sociality, task motivation, and age all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance and group size were non-significant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioural observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may therefore be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation, and our findings highlight in particular several possible scenarios through which innovative behaviour might be selected for among capuchins. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | en_UK |
dc.relation | Morton FB, Buchanan-Smith HM, Brosnan SF, Thierry B, Paukner A, Essler JL, Marcum CS & Lee PC (2021) Studying animal innovation at the individual level: A ratings-based assessment in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 135 (2), pp. 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000264 | en_UK |
dc.rights | ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000264 | en_UK |
dc.title | Studying animal innovation at the individual level: A ratings-based assessment in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1037/com0000264 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33464107 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Comparative Psychology | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1939-2087 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0735-7036 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 135 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 258 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 265 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 18/01/2021 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Hull | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Georgia State University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | The National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Nottingham Trent University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Pennsylvania | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | National Institutes of Health (US) | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000668221900012 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85109187532 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1680328 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-2516-7734 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-4296-3513 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-10-15 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-10-15 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2020-11-12 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Morton, F Blake| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M|0000-0002-2516-7734 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Brosnan, Sarah F| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Thierry, Bernard| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Paukner, Annika| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Essler, Jennifer L| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Marcum, Christopher S| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Lee, Phyllis C|0000-0002-4296-3513 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2020-11-12 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-11-12| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Morton et al J Comp Psych 2020.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1939-2087 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Morton et al J Comp Psych 2020.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 577.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.