Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31893
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Jonathonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Clareen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNettle, Danielen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBateson, Melissaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-03T02:08:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-03T02:08:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-23en_UK
dc.identifier.othere0206363en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31893-
dc.description.abstractThe cyclic ratio (CR) schedule is a behavioural assay developed to study feeding in rats, in which the number of operant responses required to obtain food reward (the ratio requirement) increases and then decreases in a repeating cycle. In a recent study, we used the CR schedule with European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to investigate the effects of an early-life manipulation on adult feeding behaviour. As this was the first time the CR schedule had been used with any bird species, a more in-depth evaluation is warranted. Here, we performed a fuller CR experiment with the same birds as the prior study, a year later. First, we examine the individual consistency of feeding behaviour between experimental sessions and also between CR schedules comprising different ratio requirement progressions. We found that between-session consistency was poor to moderate, and that a geometric ratio progression provided greater between-session consistency than an arithmetic ratio progression. Second, we tried to replicate some of the canonical findings from rats working on CR schedules. In contrast to findings from rats, we found that defence of feeding rates did not increase when starlings were acutely food deprived. However, as in rats, we found that the post-reinforcement pause increased linearly with the upcoming ratio requirement, suggesting that starlings were able to learn the cyclic nature of the schedule. Third, we compared the results from the present study concerning the impacts of our early-life treatment with those from our earlier study. We found that the majority of our previous findings were replicated in the same individuals one year on, reinforcing our previous conclusion that the early-life manipulation had canalised our birds into two groups with different patterns of feeding rate defence.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_UK
dc.relationDunn J, Andrews C, Nettle D & Bateson M (2018) Evaluating the cyclic ratio schedule as an assay of feeding behaviour in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). PLOS ONE, 13 (10), Art. No.: e0206363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206363en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 Dunn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectGeneral Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_UK
dc.subjectGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciencesen_UK
dc.subjectGeneral Medicineen_UK
dc.titleEvaluating the cyclic ratio schedule as an assay of feeding behaviour in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0206363en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30352086en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Research Council under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmeen_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date23/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000448076200050en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85055609990en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1662500en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9603-7320en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7484-4447en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-10-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-11-02en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDunn, Jonathon|0000-0002-9603-7320en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAndrews, Clare|0000-0002-7484-4447en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNettle, Daniel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBateson, Melissa|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectgrant agreement No AdG 666669, COMSTAR|European Research Council under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectBB/J016446/1|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-11-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-11-02|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDunn et al 2018 Evaluating the cyclic ratio schedule....pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1932-6203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dunn et al 2018 Evaluating the cyclic ratio schedule....pdfFulltext - Published Version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.