Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31722
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChorus, Casparen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSandorf, Erlend Danckeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMouter, Nieken_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T00:02:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-24T00:02:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.othere0238683en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31722-
dc.description.abstractWe report and interpret preferences of a sample of the Dutch adult population for different strategies to end the so-called ‘intelligent lockdown’ which their government had put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a discrete choice experiment, we invited participants to make a series of choices between policy scenarios aimed at relaxing the lockdown, which were specified not in terms of their nature (e.g. whether or not to allow schools to re-open) but in terms of their effects along seven dimensions. These included health-related effects, but also impacts on the economy, education, and personal income. From the observed choices, we were able to infer the implicit trade-offs made by the Dutch between these policy effects. For example, we find that the average citizen, in order to avoid one fatality directly or indirectly related to COVID-19, is willing to accept a lasting lag in the educational performance of 18 children, or a lasting (>3 years) and substantial (>15%) reduction in net income of 77 households. We explore heterogeneity across individuals in terms of these trade-offs by means of latent class analysis. Our results suggest that most citizens are willing to trade-off health-related and other effects of the lockdown, implying a consequentialist ethical perspective. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that the elderly, known to be at relatively high risk of being affected by the virus, are relatively reluctant to sacrifice economic pain and educational disadvantages for the younger generation, to avoid fatalities. We also identify a so-called taboo trade-off aversion amongst a substantial share of our sample, being an aversion to accept morally problematic policies that simultaneously imply higher fatality numbers and lower taxes. We explain various ways in which our results can be of value to policy makers in the context of the COVID-19 and future pandemics.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationChorus C, Sandorf ED & Mouter N (2020) Diabolical dilemmas of COVID-19: An empirical study into Dutch society's trade-offs between health impacts and other effects of the lockdown. PLoS One, 15 (9), Art. No.: e0238683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238683en_UK
dc.rights© 2020 Chorus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleDiabolical dilemmas of COVID-19: An empirical study into Dutch society's trade-offs between health impacts and other effects of the lockdownen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0238683en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32936815en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue9en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission (Horizon 2020)en_UK
dc.citation.date16/09/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDelft University of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDelft University of Technologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000573658000036en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85091128787en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1664210en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7521-4773en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-08-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-09-23en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChorus, Caspar|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSandorf, Erlend Dancke|0000-0001-7521-4773en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMouter, Niek|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-11-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-11-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0238683.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1932-6203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0238683.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.