Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31651
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuipers, Jan Roukeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWestphal, Karlaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-08T00:02:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-08T00:02:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02en_UK
dc.identifier.other100954en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31651-
dc.description.abstractAlthough bilingual children and elderly have been observed to outperform monolinguals in typical executive control tasks, this bilingual advantage is not consistently found in the young adult population. Proponents of the bilingual executive control advantage argue the reason for this is that task demands in the typical tasks used are not high enough, since young adults perform at ceiling level, whereas critics of the effect argue it has benefited from publication bias. Here we test the task-load hypothesis using a standard and a difficult version of the arrow-flanker task and identify stimulus processing characteristics underlying greater bilingual executive control. We increased task demands by using an “Opposite” task in which participants were to respond to the central arrow indicating its opposite direction whilst a task cue indicated which task was to be performed at each trial. Further increase in task difficulty was expected to arise from reducing the task preparation time by using different stimulus-onset-asynchronies between cue and target stimuli. As predicted, we observed no language group differences in the normal flanker task, whereas bilinguals displayed less errors than monolinguals and were less hampered by the difficult task than monolinguals when auditory task cues were used. Event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed that the bilinguals’ conflict monitoring response occurred much earlier than the monolinguals’ when the task cue was auditory but less so when the cue was visual. Indeed, bilinguals appeared to prioritize the cue signal when it was auditory, but not when it was visual. Further ERP results showed bilinguals displayed greater attentional responses to the target stimulus than monolinguals. Finally, the behavioral and conflict-monitoring ERP responses correlated with language proficiency and usage scores. Together, these results show that when tasks demands are high and auditory processing is part of the task, bilingual adults outperform monolinguals due to better stimulus identification and greater efficiency in managing task demands.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationKuipers JR & Westphal K (2021) Auditory processing and high task demands facilitate the bilingual executive control advantage in young adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 57, Art. No.: 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100954en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Kuipers JR & Westphal K (2021) Auditory processing and high task demands facilitate the bilingual executive control advantage in young adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 57, Art. No.: 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100954 © 2020, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectbilingualismen_UK
dc.subjectexecutive controlen_UK
dc.subjectneuroplasticityen_UK
dc.subjectselective attentionen_UK
dc.subjectauditory processingen_UK
dc.subjectconflict monitoringen_UK
dc.titleAuditory processing and high task demands facilitate the bilingual executive control advantage in young adultsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2022-03-18en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Kuipers _ Westphal In press J Neurolinguistics.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 18 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100954en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Neurolinguisticsen_UK
dc.citation.issn0911-6044en_UK
dc.citation.volume57en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailjanrouke.kuipers@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/09/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594826800009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85090904543en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1658431en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5544-136Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-09-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-09-06en_UK
dc.subject.tagCognitive neuroscienceen_UK
dc.subject.tagSpeech and Natural Language Processingen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKuipers, Jan Rouke|0000-0002-5544-136Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWestphal, Karla|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-03-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-03-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2022-03-18|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameKuipers _ Westphal In press J Neurolinguistics.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0911-6044en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kuipers _ Westphal In press J Neurolinguistics.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.