Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31386
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: How is Systemic and Constructionist Therapy Change Process Narrated in Retrospective Accounts of Therapy? A Systematic Meta-synthesis Review
Author(s): Tseliou, Eleftheria
Burck, Charlotte
Forbat, Liz
Strong, Tom
O’Reilly, Michelle
Contact Email: elizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Change process
Constructionist therapy
Psychotherapy process
Systematic meta‐synthesis review
Qualitative research
Systemic therapy
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2020
Citation: Tseliou E, Burck C, Forbat L, Strong T & O’Reilly M (2020) How is Systemic and Constructionist Therapy Change Process Narrated in Retrospective Accounts of Therapy? A Systematic Meta-synthesis Review. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12562
Abstract: Despite the considerable potential of qualitative approaches for studying the systemic and constructionist therapy process due to shared theoretical and epistemological premises, to date there is lack of a comprehensive qualitative synthesis of how change process is experienced and conceptualized by clients and therapists. To address this evidence gap, we performed a systematic meta‐synthesis review of 30 studies reporting clients’ and therapists’ retrospective narratives of change process across systemic and constructionist models and across a range of client configurations, including individuals, couples, families, and groups. The studies were identified following a systematic search in PsycINFO and MEDLINE resulting in 2,977 articles, which were screened against eligibility criteria. Thematic analysis led to the identification of four main themes: (1) navigating through differences, (2) toward nonpathologizing construction of problems, (3) navigating through power imbalances, and (4) toward new and trusting ways of relating. Findings illustrate the multifaceted aspects of systemic and constructionist change process, the importance for their reflexive appraisal, and the need for further research contributing to the understanding of the challenges inherent in the systemic and constructionist therapeutic context.
DOI Link: 10.1111/famp.12562
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fam Proc_Tseliouetal_retrospective.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version5.34 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2022-07-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.