Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31386
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTseliou, Eleftheriaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurck, Charlotteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorForbat, Lizen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStrong, Tomen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Reilly, Michelleen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-04T00:03:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-04T00:03:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31386-
dc.description.abstractDespite the considerable potential of qualitative approaches for studying the systemic and constructionist therapy process due to shared theoretical and epistemological premises, to date there is lack of a comprehensive qualitative synthesis of how change process is experienced and conceptualized by clients and therapists. To address this evidence gap, we performed a systematic meta‐synthesis review of 30 studies reporting clients’ and therapists’ retrospective narratives of change process across systemic and constructionist models and across a range of client configurations, including individuals, couples, families, and groups. The studies were identified following a systematic search in PsycINFO and MEDLINE resulting in 2,977 articles, which were screened against eligibility criteria. Thematic analysis led to the identification of four main themes: (1) navigating through differences, (2) toward nonpathologizing construction of problems, (3) navigating through power imbalances, and (4) toward new and trusting ways of relating. Findings illustrate the multifaceted aspects of systemic and constructionist change process, the importance for their reflexive appraisal, and the need for further research contributing to the understanding of the challenges inherent in the systemic and constructionist therapeutic context.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationTseliou E, Burck C, Forbat L, Strong T & O’Reilly M (2020) How is Systemic and Constructionist Therapy Change Process Narrated in Retrospective Accounts of Therapy? A Systematic Meta-synthesis Review. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12562en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectChange processen_UK
dc.subjectConstructionist therapyen_UK
dc.subjectPsychotherapy processen_UK
dc.subjectSystematic meta‐synthesis reviewen_UK
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_UK
dc.subjectSystemic therapyen_UK
dc.titleHow is Systemic and Constructionist Therapy Change Process Narrated in Retrospective Accounts of Therapy? A Systematic Meta-synthesis Reviewen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2022-07-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Fam Proc_Tseliouetal_retrospective.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 24 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/famp.12562en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32602564en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFamily Processen_UK
dc.citation.issn1545-5300en_UK
dc.citation.issn0014-7370en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailelizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/06/2020en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Thessalyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationTavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Calgaryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leicesteren_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000544069100001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85087120327en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1642011en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9114-731Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7218-5775en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-05-07en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-07-03en_UK
dc.subject.tagFamily Therapyen_UK
dc.subject.tagQualitative evidence synthesisen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fam Proc_Tseliouetal_retrospective.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version5.34 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2022-07-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.