Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31350
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDa Re, Danieleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOlivares, Angel Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Williamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVallejo-Marín, Marioen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-30T00:02:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-30T00:02:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31350-
dc.description.abstractBackground Hybridisation associated with biological invasions may generate new phenotypic combinations, allowing hybrids to occupy new ecological niches. To date, few studies have assessed niche shifts associated with hybridisation in recently introduced populations while simultaneously characterising the niche of parental species in both native and introduced ranges. Aims Here, we compared (1) the ecological niche of a novel hybrid monkeyflower, M. × robertsii, with the niches of its two parental taxa (M. guttatus, M. luteus), and (2) the ecological niches of native (Americas) and introduced parental populations (Europe and New Zealand). Methods We assembled >13,000 geo-referenced occurrence records and eight environmental variables and conducted an ecological niche model analysis using maximum entropy, principal component and niche dynamics analysis. Results We found no evidence of niche shift in the hybrid, which may result in potential competition between parental and derived taxa in the introduced range. M. guttatus showed niche conservatism in introduced populations in Europe, but a niche shift in New Zealand, while M. luteus showed a niche shift in Europe. Conclusions The comparison of native and non-native populations of parental taxa, suggests that whether invasions result in niche shifts or not depends on both taxon and geographic region, highlighting the idiosyncratic nature of biological invasions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_UK
dc.relationDa Re D, Olivares AP, Smith W & Vallejo-Marín M (2020) Global analysis of ecological niche conservation and niche shift in exotic populations of monkeyflowers (Mimulus guttatus, M. luteus) and their hybrid (M. x robertsii). Plant Ecology and Diversity, 13 (2), pp. 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2020.1750721en_UK
dc.relation.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11667/156en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Plant Ecology and Diversity on 27 May 2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2020.1750721en_UK
dc.subjectErythrantheen_UK
dc.subjectglobal changeen_UK
dc.subjecthybridisationen_UK
dc.subjectinvasive speciesen_UK
dc.subjectMimulusen_UK
dc.subjectniche conservatismen_UK
dc.subjectniche modellingen_UK
dc.subjectpolyploidyen_UK
dc.titleGlobal analysis of ecological niche conservation and niche shift in exotic populations of monkeyflowers (Mimulus guttatus, M. luteus) and their hybrid (M. x robertsii)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-05-28en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[TPED-2019-0093.R5_fullDoc.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17550874.2020.1750721en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePlant Ecology and Diversityen_UK
dc.citation.issn1755-1668en_UK
dc.citation.issn1755-0874en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage133en_UK
dc.citation.epage146en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailmario.vallejo@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date27/05/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000541176400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85086226346en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1638897en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5663-8025en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-03-30en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-06-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDa Re, Daniele|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOlivares, Angel P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSmith, William|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVallejo-Marín, Mario|0000-0002-5663-8025en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-05-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2021-05-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2021-05-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTPED-2019-0093.R5_fullDoc.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1755-1668en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TPED-2019-0093.R5_fullDoc.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version319.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.