Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLambert, Paul-
dc.contributor.advisorShapira, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Camilla-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T08:02:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31264-
dc.description.abstractSocial stratification position is a key explanatory variable in the social sciences, as is gender. Social stratification position is often measured using individual occupations. However, the occupational structure and the gender structure of society intertwine in numerous complex ways. The interlock of these structures makes the measurement of women’s social positions problematic. This thesis explores approaches to measuring women’s positions which aim to account, at least partially, for this complexity. This thesis begins by providing an overview of the relationship between the gender structure and occupational structure from the 1970s to present, with a focus on the United Kingdom. Then a gendered critique of conventional approaches to the measurement of stratification position in the social sciences is offered. In the remaining part of the thesis, three suggested strategies are tested that might better account for the relationship between gender and occupations; (i) Gender-specific measures, (ii) Household-level approaches, and (iii) Intersectional approaches. A methodology for the creation of gender-specific ‘SEI’ and ‘CAMSIS’ measures using British Household Panel Survey data is described before three analysis chapters are presented that draw on the International Social Survey Programme and British Social Attitudes data. The results suggest that social stratification researchers would benefit from engaging with the ideas of intersectionality, though they should recognise that inequalities are not intersectional in all contexts. A further conclusion is that multilevel models offer a promising analytical approach for intersectional research. The comparison of measures showed varying results, which would have led to some substantial differences in conclusions had only one measure been considered. Thus, a further conclusion is that undertaking a sensitivity analysis is of importance when measuring women’s stratification position and that several approaches to using household and individual level, including gender-specific, measures, should be compared.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.rightsThe copyright of this thesis belongs to the author under the terms of the United Kingdom Copyright Acts as qualified by the University of Stirling Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research. Due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis.en_GB
dc.subjectsocial stratificationen_GB
dc.subjectIntersectionalityen_GB
dc.subjectsocial statisticsen_GB
dc.subjectfeminismen_GB
dc.subjectmulti-level modelsen_GB
dc.subjectsociologyen_GB
dc.subjectquantitative methodsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshIntersectionality (Sociology) Great Britainen_GB
dc.subject.lcshSocial stratification Great Britainen_GB
dc.subject.lcshFeminism Great Britain Case studiesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEquality Great Britainen_GB
dc.titleRecognising the intersection of gender and occupations when measuring women’s social positionsen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2021-06-31-
dc.rights.embargoreasontime to write journal articlesen_GB
dc.contributor.funderESRCen_GB
dc.contributor.funderESRCen_GB
dc.author.emailcamilla.barnett.1991@gmail.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2021-07-01en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2021-07-01-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
C_Barnett_Thesis.pdf4.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.