Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Should all choices count? Using the cut-offs approach to edit responses in a choice experiment
Author(s): Bush, Glenn
Colombo, Sergio
Hanley, Nicholas
Contact Email:
Keywords: choice modelling
choice consistency
random parameters logit
Tourism Government policy
Issue Date: Nov-2009
Date Deposited: 28-Jun-2011
Citation: Bush G, Colombo S & Hanley N (2009) Should all choices count? Using the cut-offs approach to edit responses in a choice experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44 (3), pp. 397-414.;
Abstract: Should we give equal weight to all responses in a choice experiment? Previous Choice Modelling papers have considered the issue of the internal consistency of choices – such as the extent to which strictly-dominated options are chosen. In this paper, a different focus is employed, namely the extent to which people choose options which violate their stated upper or lower limits for the acceptable levels for individual attributes. Since hypothetical over-statement of WTP has been a focus in stated preference studies, we concentrate on violations of stated upper limits of WTP, and explore the effects of “editing” such choices using a variable censoring rule and alternative approaches to re-classifying choices. The empirical case study is a choice experiment on eco-tourists in Rwanda. Our main conclusion is that the suggested approach offers a useful way of imposing consistency on choices, and that editing choices in this manner has an appreciable impact on estimated willingness to pay. However, issues remain with regard to explaining why people apparently violate their stated maximum willingness to pay.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s10640-009-9292-6
Rights: Published in Environmental and Resource Economics by Springer.; The final publication is available at

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Should all choices count.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version351.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.