Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31118
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Florianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeBruine, Lisa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolzleitner, Iris Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Shea, Kieran Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFasolt, Vanessaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-09T00:02:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-09T00:02:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06en_UK
dc.identifier.other18en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31118-
dc.description.abstractFacial similarity between individuals informs kinship judgments in third-party kin recognition. Indeed, one study found that similarity and kinship judgments encapsulate the same information (Maloney & Dal Martello, 2006). Yet, another study found that this is not the case when comparing adult face pairs of different sex (DeBruine et al., 2009). We replicated these studies to further clarify the role of facial similarity in kin recognition. We recruited 318 raters, who were shown 50 sibling pairs and 50 age- and sex-matched unrelated pairs ranging from 3 to 17 years old. Each rater was randomly assigned to make either kinship judgments (“related” or “unrelated”) or similarity judgments (scale from 0-“not very similar” to 10-“very similar”). The threshold model found that performance in both tasks was equally accurate, with participants detecting child siblings in the kinship task above chance and giving significantly higher similarity ratings to siblings in the similarity task. In both tasks, opposite-sex siblings were perceived to be siblings less often than same-sex siblings, while judgments of unrelated face pairs were not affected by the sex of faces. Conversely, the effect of age difference within pairs of faces differed for the two tasks: an increased age difference decreased all kinship judgments but only decreased similarity judgments of siblings, not unrelated pairs. In line with DeBruine et al. (2009), these findings suggest that similarity and kinship judgments are highly correlated but not strictly synonymous. The OSF Pre-registration Challenge for this project can be found at osf.io/ps9hy and the data at osf.io/sef9k.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyen_UK
dc.relationLee AJ, Hansen F, DeBruine LM, Holzleitner IJ, O'Shea KJ & Fasolt V (2020) Kin recognition and perceived facial similarity. Journal of Vision, 20 (6), Art. No.: 18. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.6.18en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright 2020 The Authors This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectallocentric kin recognitionen_UK
dc.subjectface perceptionen_UK
dc.subjectsimilarityen_UK
dc.subjectresemblanceen_UK
dc.titleKin recognition and perceived facial similarityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-06-24en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/jov.20.6.18en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32579674en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Visionen_UK
dc.citation.issn1534-7362en_UK
dc.citation.volume20en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission (Horizon 2020)en_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.lee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/06/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000552919500019en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85087098487en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1614048en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-04-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-05-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHansen, Florian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeBruine, Lisa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolzleitner, Iris J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Shea, Kieran J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFasolt, Vanessa|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-06-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-06-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2020-06-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamei0035-8711-640-1-07210.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1534-7362en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
i0035-8711-640-1-07210.pdfFulltext - Published Version565.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.