Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31105
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Dombrowski, Stephan U | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | O'Carroll, Ronan E | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cheyne, Helen | - |
dc.contributor.author | McLellan, Julie Margaret | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-07T13:06:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-07T13:06:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | McLellan, J. M., O’Carroll, R. E., Cheyne, H., & Dombrowski, S. U. (2019). Investigating midwives’ barriers and facilitators to multiple health promotion practice behaviours: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implementation Science, 14(1), 64. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31105 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Midwives are expected to perform multiple health promotion practice behaviours (HePPBes) such as informing pregnant women about the benefits of physical activity during pregnancy and asking women about their alcohol consumption. However, no formal support appears to be available to midwives in carrying out these tasks. This thesis describes the systematic development of an evidence-based, theory-informed intervention to support midwives in addressing health behaviours with pregnant women. Methods This thesis consisted of four phases. Phase 1: review of the evidence including key documentation and a narrative review to identify interventions to support midwives’ HePPBes. Phase 2: semi-structured interviews with midwives (N= 11) based on the theoretical domains framework and an online questionnaire assessing midwives’ views on HePPBes (N= 505). Phase 3: systematic development of the HePPBe toolkit, integrating: i) target population, ii) target behaviours, ii) theory, iv) behaviour change techniques and v) format of delivery. User, patient and public involvement was carried out throughout phase 3. Phase 4: online questionnaire to assess midwives’ preliminary views (N= 108) on the acceptability of the newly developed HePPBe toolkit. Results and conclusions A review of existing evidence identified multiple policies and guidelines implicating midwives in performing HePPBes. However, no peer-reviewed literature reported interventions to support midwives in carrying out their HePPBes. New evidence found midwives perceived barriers to carrying out HePPBes, such as a requirement to perform an increasing amount of HePPBes on top of existing clinical workload. Facilitators, including strategies used by midwives to perform HePPBes, were also identified. Performance of HePPBes was predicted by psychological factors, including confidence, intrinsic drive, and feelings of being supported. These findings informed the development of a handheld HePPBe toolkit with evidence of preliminary acceptability. This thesis provides a practical example of how to systematically develop a multiple behaviour change intervention for, and in consultation with, healthcare professionals. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.subject | Midwives | en_GB |
dc.subject | Midwife | en_GB |
dc.subject | health behaviours | en_GB |
dc.subject | Health psychology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Healthcare professionals | en_GB |
dc.subject | Multiple behaviour change | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Midwifery | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Midwives Congresses | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Pregnant women | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Health psychology | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Health promotion | en_GB |
dc.title | The development of an intervention to support midwives in addressing multiple health behaviours with pregnant women | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.contributor.funder | This thesis was funded by the University of Stirling in collaboration with the Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre. The Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre (SISCC) is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Chief Scientist’s Office, NHS Education for Scotland and The Health Foundation with in-kind contributions from participating partner universities and health boards. The grant reference number is 242343290 was received from SFC on behalf of all funders. | en_GB |
dc.author.email | julie.m.mclellan@outlook.com | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
McLellan_Minorcorrections_Final ever copy.pdf | 19.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.