Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: A qualitative study in the UK
Author(s): Jepson, Ruth
Hewison, Jenny
Thompson, Andrew
Weller, David
Contact Email:
Keywords: Information
Informed choice
Patient perspective
Cancer screening
Medical screening
Cancer Diagnosis
Cancer Nursing
Issue Date: Sep-2007
Date Deposited: 17-Jun-2011
Citation: Jepson R, Hewison J, Thompson A & Weller D (2007) Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: A qualitative study in the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 65 (5), pp. 890-899.
Abstract: The principle of informed choice has been recently incorporated into cancer screening policy. However, there is limited empirical or theoretical work on informed choice in this particular context. The main aim of the study reported here was to explore the information needs of people invited for screening, and to gain insights into the relationship between the information they wanted and the choices they made. A qualitative study (nine focus groups and 15 individual interviews) was undertaken with people who had contrasting experiences (and outcomes) of either breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening at two locations in Scotland, UK. Findings suggest that lay people define and conceptualise informed choice differently from policy makers. The study also found that information about the disease was as important to people as information on the risks and limitations of screening. However, information may have little part to play in the choices people make. Rather, it may have more impact on outcomes such as satisfaction and anxiety. An explicit policy aim in promoting informed choice is to enhance patient autonomy and to prevent people from being deceived or coerced. However, this research shows that the provision of evidence-based information alone does not necessarily mean that an informed choice is made. People may not read, want, or understand the information, and, additionally, they may not be able to carry out their intended choice. There may be personal barriers, such as physical or mental health problems and language, or organisational barriers, such as the availability of the service/intervention and access. Therefore, the term ‘informed choice’ might not be useful in this context.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.009
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jepson - Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening etc.pdfFulltext - Published Version147.07 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-16    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.